Would it make sense (and might it be a good idea) to be a scientific realist about some parts of science and a metaphysical constructivist about other parts?

Write 2000 words (+/- 10%), including any footnotes but not including references.

Write in a clear, direct style. Give as much introduction as you think is needed and
then get straight down to answering the question. Avoid discursive footnotes.
It’s not necessary to do a lot of extra reading in order to do well, but you can contact
your tutor for suggestions for things to read. (Don’t hope for guidance from wandering the internet. Most philosophical material on the internet is not good.)

1. Would it make sense (and might it be a good idea) to be a scientific realist about some parts of science and a metaphysical constructivist about other parts?

PLEASE USE THE TEXTBOOK ‘THEORY AND REALITY’ CHAPTER 12 AS BASIS FOR ARGUMENTS. IT MUST ALSO BE CITED TO SHOW THE PROFESSOR I HAVE READ THE TEXTBOOK.