15/01/2019 Guidelines
1. THE REPORT DEMONSTRATED SOME KNOWLEDGE OF RELEVANT CONCEPTS BUT THERE WERE SIGNIFICANT GAPS IN RELATION TO INTELLIGENCE COLLECTIONS AND ANALYSES, LIMITED RESEARCH WAS USED
2′ UNFORTUNATELY MOST OF YOUR ARGUMENTS/CLAIMS WERE NOT SUBSTANTIATED AS YOU HAVE NOT USED ACADEMIC SOURCES IN YOUR REPORT. WITHOUT SUCH SUPPORT, YOUR ARGUMENTS DID NOT WITHSTAND SCRUTINY.
3, YOU HAVE NOT SUMMARISED OR EVALUATED DATA. NO INFERENCE WERE MADE ORDER TO EXPLAIN THE SITUATION.
THE RECOMMENDATIONS WERE NOT SUPPORTED BY ANY HYPOTHESES WRITING AND REFERENCING
Follow the revision comments:
” I am not quite sure whether or not this writer used the initial documents I uploaded where all the criteria, the scenario and the notes were, and together with
the feedback from my lecturer. The reason for this is that as I have gone through the work, I have not being able to spot exactly whether the scenario the assessment is based
on was discussed in detailed. It is possible that he might, have but its acually not clear.”
Make sure to meet the word count and proofread the paper. The paper should be Master’s level.
