Writing an Evidence Based Scientific Report in Nuclear Medicine

I already did Part A and I attached for to you with the other the documents to check the information if you want to use them, or if you have any correction on it, you could do it.
I also attached to you all the articles you need to read through to complete the research.

I just need you to work on Part B and Part C which can be done together as a report. I need you to write 1100 words as a maximum for both parts.
Part B: is writing a report on an issue with the test (Diuresis renography: compare the different protocols that used in this procedure and the impact of the results F0, F-15, F+ 20-30) that are discussed in journal articles. Something that is up for a question about the test – how it should be used (which role it is best at performing or which information it should not be expected to provide), or how it should be carried out, which radiopharmaceutical or imaging technique is best etc. You need to write an introductory sentence or two that talks about the issue and sets up what you will research. Find articles about that question, you should choose some that disagree with each other. You will need more than one article. As a conclusion, choose which side of the issue you agree with in the report and say why you have chosen your answer. Make sure you match what you talk about in your introduction, report and conclusion.
Part C: is describing and justifying how you chose which journal articles to use to write your report. Which articles did you decide you would use, and not use, and why? Were they irrelevant? Were they poorly written or containing too few patients? ( This part depend on which articles to use, and which ones to reject).