The summary in Chapter 10 states, “The Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination and guarantees citizens due process of law by limiting the federal government’s actions: “No person shall … be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself” and “No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.” The Supreme Court has extended the elements of due process through case law beyond the words of the Constitution but in keeping with its spirit.”

The summary in Chapter 10 states, “The Fifth Amendment protects against self-incrimination and guarantees citizens due process of law by limiting the federal government’s actions: “No person shall … be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself” and “No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.” The Supreme Court has extended the elements of due process through case law beyond the words of the Constitution but in keeping with its spirit.”

1. What two criteria must be met for the Miranda warning to be necessary?
2. Why would it be wise for an officer to read the Miranda rights from a card?
3. Does the Miranda decision impede police work?
4. Why should government be limited on how and when it asks questions?
5. Should a “stop” require the Miranda warning?
6. Why might trickery, innuendo, or even falsehoods asserted by police during questioning may not be Fifth Amendment violations? Should these techniques be Fifth Amendment violations?

Please number the questions and write the answers. This does not need to be in essay form.