Case Study Analysis

Please read the attached case: Chiquita and Department of Justice.
This assignment constitutes evidence of your understanding of the concepts presented in the readings. It requires an organized, concise, coherent, and argumentatively sound response to an assigned case study. Application of the concepts presented in the course is essential, most especially the Principled Ethical Reasoning Approach. Your analysis will be evaluated using the criteria mentioned in the Grading Rubric, specifically clarity, organization, use of course material, use of outside sources, and quality of analysis are the criteria used to evaluate student performance on this assignment. Use the APA Style Method when composing your paper.

Please answer the following questions in the essay (This is the principle ethical reading approach requested by instructor) :
1. Is this an ethical problem? Why or why not
2. What values and principles are IN CONFLICT in this analysis? Explain.
3. What is your decision? Would you have made the same choice as the business or a different choice?
4. What alternatives are available to the decision-makers in this case? Explain.
5. Who are the relevant stakeholders in this case? What are the harms and benefits that accrue to each stakeholder group?

Tips from Professor on What NOT to do:
Principles: does not identify underlying ethical dilemma (what values are in conflict)
Character: the paper never really discusses how the actions being proposed are related to their character/identity/mission. If a company declares itself to be X, then how consistent are its actions (and your proposal) to its declarations?
Consequences: They fail to account comprehensively for how their decision (and a key alternative) affects key stakeholders both beneficially and adversely.
DO NOT REPEAT CASE FACTS – I have read this case multiple times. Only cite those that will directly aid you in your argumentation (and even then do not do a data dump)