Explain how a priori knowledge differs from a posteriori knowledge and whether it is possible.
2. Argue that testimony is/is not a source of knowledge independent from other sources of knowledge.
3. Explain Hume’s problem for induction and argue that it shows/it does not show that inductive knowledge impossible.
4. Explain Goodman’s problem for induction and argue that it shows/it does not show that inductive knowledge is impossible.

Choose one of the topics. In between 1500-2000 words.
In the format of:
I will argue for the view that P. There are many reasons to believe that P. Firstly…Secondly…Thirdly… The strongest objection to P says… However this objection does not succeed for the following reasons. The following is the only source you should use:
http://bespalovseminar.narod.ru/literature/Epist_Cont_Read.pdf