This discussion board is aligned with the module objective “Demonstrate community assessments and apply the principles of epidemiology.” As part of the discussion you will:
Review the concepts of epidemiology in disease control and prevention (p. 70-78).
Apply ecosocial epidemiology paradigm (macro-level) to one of your chosen diagnosis from module 1 written assignment (p.72).

TEXTBOOK
Title Community/Public Health Nursing
Author Mary A. Nies; Melanie McEwen
ISBN 978-0-323-52894-8
Publisher Elsevier – Health Sciences Division
Publication Date October 1, 2018

This discussion board is aligned with the module objective “Demonstrate community assessments and apply the principles of epidemiology.” As part of the discussion you will:
Review the concepts of epidemiology in disease control and prevention (p. 70-78).
Apply ecosocial epidemiology paradigm (macro-level) to one of your chosen diagnosis from module 1 written assignment (p.72).

TEXTBOOK
Title Community/Public Health Nursing
Author Mary A. Nies; Melanie McEwen
ISBN 978-0-323-52894-8
Publisher Elsevier – Health Sciences Division
Publication Date October 1, 2018

Hi, I need two paragraph for each assignment please.

1) Tom and Emma are married, and one day become pregnant, as they had planned. During the third trimester of Emma pregnancy, she develops severe black paint that, while not life threatening , will require her to be bedridden for the last three months of her pregnancy. otherwise, Emma will miscarry. Emma and tom consider whether to have a abortion, reasoning that Emma risks her job and income if she cannot go to work for three months. should the law protect Emma right to a late-term abortion? why or why not, and base on what ethical theory: virtue ethics, deontology, or utilitarianism.

……………………………………………………………………………………………..
Second assignment.

2) State the actual research question that you want to answer.

* justify the need for the study-
-why are you doing this study?
– why is this something you would like to research ?
* what type of study are you doing( pick one from below)
– quantitative study ( experimental , correlation, or survey)
* qualitative study ( ethnographic, historical or case study)

Degree: POST GRADUATE DIPLOMA IN MENTAL HEALTH NURSING (AUSTRALIAN mental health nursing standard)

If you could please include some of the following things if you feel they have any relevance: ?
– deseclation techniques
– redirection techniques
– use of sensory room or sensory modulation
– other personal coping strategies a patient/consumer may find helpful to calm self down
– Daily sexual safety risk assessments (DSSRAx’s) (takes into account past history and current vulnerabilities)
– daily risk assessments (daily for LDU, every shift for ICA/HDU) (takes into account past history and current vulnerabilities)
deciding on visual obs- 15 mins vis obs, 30 min vis obs or 60 min vis obs (takes into account past history and current vulnerabilities)
– gender sensitive area (GSA) which ideally is for individuals whom identify as female and anyone that is part of the LGBTQI community. Of course this is not always possible due to there being more males on the ward, however as staff it’s important to look at each patient and see who would (if males need to be down the GSA) be most appropriate to be in the GSA.
– Ensure to provide all female patients with a swipe access wrist band which enables them to enter the GSA and if there are males rooms in the GSA they do not receive a wrist band and are only allowed to be in the GSA when they are going to sleep at night.
– There are no visitors to be in patients room and no patients are to be in co-Pt’s rooms.
– try best to allocate a female contact nurse or male contact nurse to an individual that has previous trauma

journals and texts that may help help:
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing
British Journal of Psychiatry
Hospital and Community Psychiatry
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing

What’s in the uploads: (5uploads in total)
– outline of assignment including instructions of format and marking criteria
– Lecture notes from wk1-5 (excluding wk2)

Use the Internet and/or the Strayer Library (https://research.strayer.edu) to research one criminal case within the last three years in which authorities found the defendant to be engaging in deviant behavior. As you research this case, investigate the manner in which social controls may have helped or hurt the defendant.

Write a 3- to 5-page paper in which you address the following thoroughly. Cite specifics from the case wherever possible to support your arguments:

Determine whether or not you believe social controls played a significant role in the consequences for the defendant. Provide a rationale to support your position.
Debate whether you believe that the social norms for persons of the defendant’s age support the use of this behavior. Next, support or criticize whether the social norms of persons the defendant’s age are reasonable in a very “politically correct” society. Provide support for your response.
Argue for or against the theory that an “informal sanction” (i.e., ostracism by peers) would have deterred the defendant’s behavior. Next, specify whether or not the “informal sanctions” would have satisfied anyone who was offended by the behavior of the defendant. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Identify formal sanctions brought against the defendant for the behavior. Considering the sanction, elaborate on the primary manner in which this formal sanction carried out the purpose of protecting persons connected to the defendant. Justify your response.
Use at least three quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar types of websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Papers should contain a 1.) review of research on a communication/ conflict resolution/ mediation/ arbitration/ negotiation topic in either an interpersonal or organizational setting and 2.) strong analytic and/or prescriptive elements. Each paper will be assigned a number grade based on clarity of presentation, persuasiveness of arguments and the degree to which concepts and insights from the course are incorporated into the paper.
***Include at least 1 Harvard Business School (HBS) article as a source.

Papers should contain a 1.) review of research on a communication/ conflict resolution/ mediation/ arbitration/ negotiation topic in either an interpersonal or organizational setting and 2.) strong analytic and/or prescriptive elements. Each paper will be assigned a number grade based on clarity of presentation, persuasiveness of arguments and the degree to which concepts and insights from the course are incorporated into the paper.
***Include at least 1 Harvard Business School (HBS) article as a source.

Details of task: Students are required to write a 2,000 word essay on ONE question from Topics 1 – 4.
A list of essay topics will be provided to students on the APG5393 Moodle site, from which they are to choose ONE question to answer.
Students will also be provided with a detailed grading rubric, that will be used when marking their assignments.

Word limit: 2,000 words
Value: 20%

Criteria for marking: A marking rubric will be made available to students, and they should consult this document while preparing their essay.
In assessing your essays ALL of the following will be considered:
● Your level of understanding of the ethical and conceptual issues raised in the readings.

● Your level of understanding of the ethical and conceptual issues raised in the readings.
● Evidence of your ability to evaluate arguments for and against different moral views.
● How successfully you answer the specific essay question.
● The extent to which you develop a clearly stated argument to your conclusion throughout the essay.
● Your capacity to support your own ethical and philosophical views with sound reasoning.
● The extent to which the essay is structured to present material in a clear and logical sequence.
● The extent to which your essay engages with the readings relevant to the essay question.
● The extent to which you conform to appropriate standards of academic referencing and citation.
● The clarity of your written and philosophical expression, including stylistic aspects (e.g. grammar, paragraphing, etc.).
The levels of performance for the different grades, are as follows: High Distinction 80-100 (HD)
Addresses all of the assessment criteria to a very high standard. Exceptionally clear understanding of subject matter and appreciation of issues. Evidence of insight and originality where appropriate. Clearly and logically organised with excellent presentation.
Distinction 70-79 (D)
Addresses all the assessment criteria, with several to a high standard. Strong grasp of subject matter and appreciation of key issues.
Clearly and logically organised with good presentation. Credit 60-69 (C)
Addresses most of the assessment criteria reasonably well. Competent understanding of subject matter and appreciation of most of the main issues. Competent organisation and presentation.
Pass 50-59 (P)
Satisfactory. Addresses most of the assessment criteria adequately, though lacking in depth and breadth. Demonstrates appreciation of subject matter and issues. Often work of this standard demonstrates only basic comprehension or competency, and may be poorly structured and presented.
Fail 0-49 (N)
Unsatisfactory. Addresses the assessment criteria inadequately. Minimal or inadequate understanding of subject matter. Work is often inadequate in depth and breadth, and sometimes incomplete or irrelevant. Lack of care and thought in organising, presenting and structuring work.

Referencing requirements:
To build your skills in citing and referencing, and using different referencing styles, see the online tutorial Academic Integrity: Demystifying Citing and Referencing at http://www.lib.monash.edu/tutorials/citing/

Papers should contain a 1.) review of research on a communication/ conflict resolution/ mediation/ arbitration/ negotiation topic in either an interpersonal or organizational setting and 2.) strong analytic and/or prescriptive elements. Each paper will be assigned a number grade based on clarity of presentation, persuasiveness of arguments and the degree to which concepts and insights from the course are incorporated into the paper.
***Include at least 1 Harvard Business School (HBS) article as a source.Papers should contain a 1.) review of research on a communication/ conflict resolution/ mediation/ arbitration/ negotiation topic in either an interpersonal or organizational setting and 2.) strong analytic and/or prescriptive elements. Each paper will be assigned a number grade based on clarity of presentation, persuasiveness of arguments and the degree to which concepts and insights from the course are incorporated into the paper.
***Include at least 1 Harvard Business School (HBS) article as a source.

Essay Prompt: Hamlet can be seen as a conflict between reason and passion. How does passion control characters in the play, driving their actions? When does reason do passion’s bidding, serving passion’s purpose rather than controlling passion? When does reason control passion? Reason or Passion? Which caused tragedy in Hamlet?
Essay Assignment: Write an essay in response to the prompt question, “what caused tragedy in Hamlet, reason or uncontrolled passion? In other words, “what caused disaster in the lives of the characters in Hamlet”? Your essay will make a claim regarding the prompt question, supported with evidence and analysis. You will also present a counter-argument to your claim and your rebuttal to that point of view.

Since this essay takes the form of a debate there are essentially two choices. (Use the outline below(included) to help with the essay).