I would like for you to find 1 reference that can answer this question:

-Identify the similarities and differences between how sociology, personality psychology, and social psychology attempt to understand and predict human behavior.

And write a 1 page paper on it in APA format.

*** Please no plagiarism from any source. Last time a writer from this company plagiarized my introduction on my 4 page essay that he wrote for me. ***I would like for you to find 1 reference that can answer this question:

-Identify the similarities and differences between how sociology, personality psychology, and social psychology attempt to understand and predict human behavior.

And write a 1 page paper on it in APA format.

*** Please no plagiarism from any source. Last time a writer from this company plagiarized my introduction on my 4 page essay that he wrote for me. ***

I want to keep the same country and same environmental questions from the essay provided. However, want to perfect, fix the essay as well as change the tables and numbers on this project so that they are done based on the set of data I am providing on the dropbox link below. Please check the powerpoint slides for more details about the assessment and the “example syntax” file for the lecturer’s example and the other syntax file for my attempt on spain. Also, can I please have the syntax file for all the work done if using syntax (with notes if necessary).
https://www.dropbox.com/s/16of6yt2busmz4k/WVS_Longitudinal_1981_2014_spss_v2015_04_18.sav?dl=0
These are the things that need to be done:
Chose the wave 2010-2014 only for all questions
Rename variables
Remove missing data, and the “other” category in so that we are left with only two categories in each variable
Weighing the data
Binary Logistics regression – chi square
Crosstabsulation (if needed)
Correlation (bivariate)
T-test and non-parametric tests
Logit models

Then talk about the relationship between the questions in relations to people’s attitudes and policy implications.

(600 words)
-75-100 words introduction
-400-450 words main body of the essay
-75-100 words conclusion

You must have atleast four references.
– use books, journals, academic websites and papers etc.

“Be critical NOT descriptive”(600 words)
-75-100 words introduction
-400-450 words main body of the essay
-75-100 words conclusion

You must have atleast four references.
– use books, journals, academic websites and papers etc.

“Be critical NOT descriptive”(600 words)
-75-100 words introduction
-400-450 words main body of the essay
-75-100 words conclusion

You must have atleast four references.
– use books, journals, academic websites and papers etc.

“Be critical NOT descriptive”(600 words)
-75-100 words introduction
-400-450 words main body of the essay
-75-100 words conclusion

You must have atleast four references.
– use books, journals, academic websites and papers etc.

“Be critical NOT descriptive”

Review article originally rejected but strongly encouraged by editor to resubmit after correcting significant errors. Please enhance original manuscript&cover letter, to include qualitative changes (ie critical analysis) as well as correct for semantic errors; and double check the recommended changes (both listed and presented in comment form from the reviewers comments–uploaded ). Lastly, increase word count by 500-600+ words. Please refer to the attached original manuscript, and the edited one “MicrorubMM2”, cover letter, and the reviewer comments with my suggestions.Review article originally rejected but strongly encouraged by editor to resubmit after correcting significant errors. Please enhance original manuscript&cover letter, to include qualitative changes (ie critical analysis) as well as correct for semantic errors; and double check the recommended changes (both listed and presented in comment form from the reviewers comments–uploaded ). Lastly, increase word count by 500-600+ words. Please refer to the attached original manuscript, and the edited one “MicrorubMM2”, cover letter, and the reviewer comments with my suggestions.

For your discussion board assignment this week, you are required to respond to one of the required readings and evidence your argument with ONE other scholarly source. This assignment serves two purposes. First, it tests your analysis of the material, and two, it sets you up in a solid direction for creating your mid-term paper.
Before you respond, ask yourself some guiding questions: what do the authors want the audience to learn, and how can we review the information as a cultural artifact—i.e. how is Silko’s excerpt or Castillo’s interview a representation of their own peoples’ experiences in America? In other words, are they providing the audience with a new and specifically minority “history”? (Remember, think within the context that narratives can be cathartic.)
For this week, we will address texts by ‘double minorities’ in order to ground our examination in a sub-group within a sub-group. Gloria Anzaldua defines such a label as both a woman and woman of color. Therefore, the person is placed in a position that implies two types of inferiority within the greater social context: they are not male and not Caucasian. Where then does Our/Their America exist? Does it exist? For some, it can only occur within the confines of literature and theory. With that idea in mind, the required reading this week includes secondary pieces on Leslie Marmon Silko and an interview with Ana Castillo. Furthermore, the theoretical article required is specific to how stories can heal, but we need to think more complex than “healing”; we need to think in terms of communal catharsis: the ability to not just purge but deal with pain, subjection, etc. via its appearance in art—literature, in this case.

Sources:

-At least 2 lectures (I will send them separately as it will not let me attach the files here)
-The article “L. Cruz, ‘Turning Dutch: Historical Myths in Early Modern Netherlands’, The Sixteenth Century Journal 39 (2008) 1: 3-22. THIS ARTICLE IS ATTACHED HERE.
-The book “A History of the Netherlands From the Sixteenth Century to the Present” by Friso Wielenga (PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU CAN ACCESS THIS BOOK)
-2 separate outside sources

Assignment:

The Dutch Golden Age is a very important historical period. Not only has it turned the Netherlands (temporarily) into a world power, relying on perhaps the first ‘modern economy’ and able to trade, fight wars, and act as colonizer across the globe. Effects of that golden seventeenth century can still be felt in Dutch society today, to the extent that an important part of what the Dutch think of themselves, their society and their identity is shaped by this Golden Age. In this assignment, you are asked to reflect upon the use made of that Golden Age in a narrative that connects history with present-day Dutch society and identity.

Your essay should make use of the following article: L. Cruz, ‘Turning Dutch: Historical Myths in Early Modern Netherlands’, The Sixteenth Century Journal 39 (2008) 1: 3-22

You should also refer to at least two of the previous lectures in the following manner: (in a foot- or endnote): As stated by Dr. Erika Kuijpers in her lecture Tolerance & Migration in the Netherlands (March 11, 2019).

Your essay should also include an assessment as to how Friso Wielenga has approached, in his introduction and first chapters, the topic of the Golden Age. Is he simply describing events as they really happened? Does he represent his narrative as the only possible interpretation of history, or not? Do you think there are more interpretations possible? Which ones? Is he offering a deeper analysis? Is he connecting Golden Age history to the present, and if so, how? These are some of the questions you could use when constructing your argument.

Besides the material suggested above, you should integrate at least two other readings in your essay.

The essay should be around 2,000 words.

(Quantitave Methods Module)

You will decide what source pay gaps you will examine (this is your ‘research question’), and then conduct an appropriate data analysis and writeup.
STRUCTURE
. Introduction
2. Prior knowledge
3. Data and Methods
4. Results
5. Conclusion
6. References
7. Tables and Figures

Introduction
The introduction section introduces the problem or question to be studied. It usually briefly tells us the state of knowledge on the issue, and why and for whom the topic is an important one.

Results
The purpose of the results section is to present your key results in a logical sequence. There should be little interpretation here – just a statement of what the results are, as opposed to what they mean.
Place all relevant tables and figures to which you refer here in the final section of the report.
Tables and figures (and any notes and titles for those tables and figures) do not count towards the word limit.
Components:
1. Describe the characteristics of your study sample.
• Refer to a table of descriptive statistics that includes a summary of your
dependent, independent, and control variables.
2. Using some form of descriptive statistics, describe the relationship between
the dependent and independent variables in your analysis.
3. Describe the results of a bivariate and multivariate regression analysis,
including the F-statistics, regression coefficients, and R-squared.
• Refer to a table that shows both bivariate and multivariate regression results. Again – place the table itself in the final section of the report.
Tips for a good Results section
• Be selective. The point of this section is to provide statistical results that address your research question – not to present as many figures and tables as you can.
o As a rule, do not include any figures or tables that you do not describe in words in the body of your report.
o This is especially important since the word limit is tight. You need to be judicious about what matters and what does not.
• Make sure the numbers in your tables/figures and your text are the same.
• Make sure that the results you present directly relate to your research question.
• It is very useful to carefully read (and to loosely mimic) the way the studies you
read phrase their results sections. I DO NOT MEAN PLAGIARIZE.
• Also remember that there are examples in the lab outlines and in my slides on
how to talk about your findings.

5) Conclusion
The conclusion is also your chance to acknowledge the limitations of your study.
Components
1. Briefly summarise the main findings of the study.
2. Discuss the relationship between your results and those found in prior research,
including potential explanations of any discrepancies and unexpected findings.
3. Analyse the strengths and limitations of your study/analysis.
4. Briefly discuss wider implications of the results.
Tips for the Conclusion:
• Do not introduce new results in this section.
• When discussing study limitations, go beyond simply listing it to think about what
it means in terms of the knowledge you have generated.
7) Tables and Figures (not counted as part of word limit)
Put all your tables and figures (each numbered consecutively) in this section.
Tips for the tables and figures:
• Tables should not be pasted directly from Stata.
• Tables and figures should be well-formatted
• Tables and figures should include clear titles, as well relevant notes.
• Tables and figures should be numbered consecutively (ie Table 1, 2, 3…; Figure
1, 2, 3…)
• Does not present estimates with a million decimal places if they are not useful.
Usually not more than three decimal places, unless more is important. This is a substantive issue, so think of it in those terms.

Please write a 500-word piece using essay style (academic writing) focusing on how your findings on the selected topic:”Oxygen; can your patient have too much of a good thing?”{written previously as Literature review-see supporting files} could be applied to the practice setting (critical care unit). Identify how you would manage the patient differently following researching the topic. This is not a reflection, it is IMPLICATION in practice. In this part we talk about what we learnt from our research and how this informed our practice / the potential practice change.
We can use first person pronouns for Introduction and Implication part, and third person pronouns for Literature review part.
It is written technically (related to the discipline for example using term anticoagulant, not blood thinner). Avoid long sentences.
Next step: please write Introduction (200-300) words {please use original introduction=edit it to make it flow with our essay} – it is general knowledge of the topic prior researching. This should be succinct and to the point. We can add references.
Next step: We can also edit Literature review { written previously-see supporting files} to integrate with the rest of the essay.
Last step: putting it all together [Original edited Introduction (200-300 words), Original edited Literature review (500 words), new 500 word piece – implication in practice + original references from literature review + additional references].
It has the right structure: Introduction, Body, Conclusion .
Thank You.

would like a report format (summary, introduction, analysis scenario, reason methodology, recommendation/conclusion) mostly about contract law (especially JCT and NEC contracts), taking into consideration even building regulation and CMD. Please let me know if you need more information. I attached a copy of the coursework and a copy of coursework with lectures guidance.

Should be single spaced

would like a report format (summary, introduction, analysis scenario, reason methodology, recommendation/conclusion) mostly about contract law (especially JCT and NEC contracts), taking into consideration even building regulation and CMD. Please let me know if you need more information. I attached a copy of the coursework and a copy of coursework with lectures guidance.

Should be single spaced