Complete a second Journal Article Review (JAR 2) using this template. In the Yorkville Library, find ONE journal article related to counselling. Ideally, you will draw from the topic you are researching for your final project and use the second JAR to further develop your understanding of the topic. For JAR 2, the design should be qualitative and utilize a formal qualitative methodology (rather than simply asking open-ended questions and reporting the results). You must distinguish the qualitative design type in the discussion. Note: once again, single-subject case studies are not permitted. In your JAR2, the methodology and analyses (including results) should be clearly discussed.
The purpose of an article review is to communicate the main points of a study and to discuss both the implications and strengths and weaknesses of the design. The review is not meant to re-iterate the details of the study and paraphrase each and every point; rather, it should summarize and discuss the study. These assignments should be seen as an opportunity for you to demonstrate your understanding of the course concepts, particularly in the Discussion section. Quotes should be used sparingly or not at all. The JAR you will complete for this assignment should be about 2 – 3 pages in length. There are no penalties for going slightly over this limit, but the final length should be close. As a rule of thumb, aim to write about 1/3 page for each of the five main section headings in the template (Introduction, Method, Results, Implications, Discussion). Use quotes sparingly, if at all; they will not be counted for content or length.
Submissions should be double-spaced and follow APA format. Please note that APA includes attention to word choice, grammar, punctuation, syntax, page and heading formatting, as well as in-text citation and referencing style. Do not use a numeral to start a sentence (use word form or re-word the sentence to avoid beginning with a number), do not use bullet points, and if you are presenting information that you have not read first-hand (i.e., a secondary source), indicate this using the (as cited in….) convention, as per APA. Note that the secondary source should not be included on your reference page. See Appendix A in the Goodwin text, pp. 379-398, for important guidelines to follow in your writing.
The blue text notes in the template are for your guidance only and do not belong in the final product. Therefore, delete all blue type and all text in square brackets. Note that this template serves as a guide for the content and format but you should consult the APA Publication Manual as well.
** Please do a QUALITATIVE** paper about mindfulness meditation and anxiety**

Additional to your detailed executive summary you must present your findings to the executive team and the venture capital group that along with the executive summary will convince the group that your solution is optimal.
Create a ten to fifteen (10-15) slide PowerPoint presentation in which you:
Illustrate the concepts from your executive summary in Section 1 of this assignment.
Create bulleted speaking notes for your presentation to the executive board in the Notes section of the PowerPoint. Note: You may create or assume any fictitious names, data, or scenarios that have not been established in this assignment for a realistic flow of communication.
Use a professional technically written style to graphically convey the information.

The paper should run about 3 pages, double-spaced, and in 12-point font. You need to write about what both these authors are trying to tell us about their belief on happiness, How mills view happiness and How Aristotle precieves happiness. What are the authors trying to tell us about their belief. How do they differ from each other. than link both these authors to two ethical theories and explain which one side with which theory and why, ask the question why does Mill side with this theory or why does Aristotle would be a better fit for this theory. discuss the theories talk about what they mean and how they can be incorporated into what Each philosopher mean. Incorporate text from the reading to show evidence what they are trying to say, about happiness and how they are linking happiness to the theory, At the end Express your own opinion about happiness and which philosopher do you agree with and why, What is the belief you share with them and explain why.

The list of theories that you can use are in a word file that is attached with this. and the reading are attached as well. PLEASE DO NOT USE OUTSIDE SOURCES, MAKE SURE YOU DO THE READING AND THEN ANSWER THE QUESTIONS ABOVE. THIS SHOULD be a well thought out paper.

THIS PAPER IS A ETHIC PAPER NOT A SOCIOLOGY THE CUSTOMER SUPPORT SAID I CAN PICK SOCIOLOGY AS THE SUBJECT AS THEY DONT HAVE AN ETHIC SUBJECT AND STATED SOCIOLOGY WRITER WRITE ETHIC PAPER AS WELL PLEASE Do not take this paper if you dont know ethic, This class room is ethic in technology. NO OUTSIDE SOURCES PLEASE

Generic name of drug- Aripiprazole
Trade name of drug- Abilify
Relevant condition the drug is used to treat-Schizophrenia in neuroscience.

Examine the above drug’s ( drug development description of its process under the following headings:
-clinical trials phase 1
-clinical trials phase 2
-clinical trials phase 3
-Regulatory approvals for the drug(Aripiprazole) used in USA and Australia including TGA, FDA) -Post-market surveillance, including any issues that have arisen( include links to news articles, publications in science journals)

References- any taken from reliable resources such as
Original articles in scientific journals
? Review articles in scientific journals
? Official reports of pharmaceutical companies and government agencies
? Authoritative news articles ? Credible websites (e.g. government agencies, scientific organisations, pharmaceutical companies)

Analyze the theory of pluralism. Your essay should discuss the following: (A) the main assumptions of pluralism concerning the role of interests and factions in American politics; (B) James Madison’s concerns about factions and their effects on government; and (C) some contemporary criticisms of pluralism in American politics.

Also,

How does the federal government regulate lobbying and what impact do these regulations have on the strategies employed by lobbyists? In your answer, be sure to discuss specific laws passed by Congress as well as recent Supreme Court decisions on campaign finance.

Advice: The first half of the prompt is fairly theoretical, whereas the second asks you to consider some of the practical implications of these theories. You might want to consider how the government has its own interests in balancing theory and practice here. For added reference, watch this video – CGP Grey: Rules for Rulers.

Revisit the keyword canvas. What tension or conflict seems to be embedded in the
term? Locate two scholarly publications from different disciplines (disciplines outside your area of expertise) that investigate or make extensive use of the term or, if it is very unusual, a related or proximal term. Write a loose, reflective letter to your best buddy or art mentor, describing why the keyword seems useful or matters and what you have learned about it so far.Revisit the keyword canvas. What tension or conflict seems to be embedded in the
term? Locate two scholarly publications from different disciplines (disciplines outside your area of expertise) that investigate or make extensive use of the term or, if it is very unusual, a related or proximal term. Write a loose, reflective letter to your best buddy or art mentor, describing why the keyword seems useful or matters and what you have learned about it so far.

The paper should run about 3 pages, double-spaced, and in 12-point font. You need to write about what both these authors are trying to tell us about their belief on happiness, How mills view happiness and How Aristotle precieves happiness. What are the authors trying to tell us about their belief. How do they differ from each other. than link both these authors to two ethical theories and explain which one side with which theory and why, ask the question why does Mill side with this theory or why does Aristotle would be a better fit for this theory. discuss the theories talk about what they mean and how they can be incorporated into what Each philosopher mean. Incorporate text from the reading to show evidence what they are trying to say, about happiness and how they are linking happiness to the theory, At the end Express your own opinion about happiness and which philosopher do you agree with and why, What is the belief you share with them and explain why.

The list of theories that you can use are in a word file that is attached with this. and the reading are attached as well. PLEASE DO NOT USE OUTSIDE SOURCES, MAKE SURE YOU DO THE READING AND THEN ANSWER THE QUESTIONS ABOVE. THIS SHOULD be a well thought out paper.

THIS PAPER IS A ETHIC PAPER NOT A SOCIOLOGY THE CUSTOMER SUPPORT SAID I CAN PICK SOCIOLOGY AS THE SUBJECT AS THEY DONT HAVE AN ETHIC SUBJECT AND STATED SOCIOLOGY WRITER WRITE ETHIC PAPER AS WELL PLEASE Do not take this paper if you dont know ethic, This class room is ethic in technology. NO OUTSIDE SOURCES PLEASE

Find 1 international company (not from US) that actively uses arbitrage in their operations or risk management. Describe how the company uses different types of arbitrage (interest rate, exchange, regulatory, labor, tax ,etc.Find 1 international company (not from US) that actively uses arbitrage in their operations or risk management. Describe how the company uses different types of arbitrage (interest rate, exchange, regulatory, labor, tax ,etc.Find 1 international company (not from US) that actively uses arbitrage in their operations or risk management. Describe how the company uses different types of arbitrage (interest rate, exchange, regulatory, labor, tax ,etc.Find 1 international company (not from US) that actively uses arbitrage in their operations or risk management. Describe how the company uses different types of arbitrage (interest rate, exchange, regulatory, labor, tax ,etc.

Clinical Reasoning and the Deteriorating Patient

 

Length: 2000 words, APA style must be used

Introduction and Conclusion MUST be included

Task

 

This assessment will require the student to apply the clinical reasoning cycle to a complex scenario and discuss the nursing role.

Using the Case Study provided, you will apply the Clinical Reasoning Cycle to the Case Scenario.

Your critical analysis should address the following:

1. Analyse the case study and develop a discussion of the application of each element of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle as outlined by Levett-Jones, T. (Ed.). (2017). Clinical Reasoning: Learning to think like a nurse (2nd ed.). Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia.
2. Use the clinical data provided to identify moments of deterioration and four (4) evidence-based nursing interventions that are appropriate at the moments of deterioration. Include your reasoning, justification and rationale utilising ‘the slippery slope’.
3. Use the ISBAR communication tool provided to develop a handover script to the Medical Officer you are calling (No more than 250 words).

While sub-headings can be used to structure this assessment, tables and dot points are not permitted.

Your responses must be supported by peer-reviewed evidence, commensurate with the level of evidence-based practice expected of a beginning practitioner.

You must support your discussion with 16 or more recent references (less than 7 years old) and credible sources.   Credible sources include the following:

• peer reviewed journal articles (these are the highest quality sources)
• contemporary text books
• best practice guidelines
• government documents
• health facility clinical guidelines, pathways and policies/procedures
• websites containing content aimed at health professionals (usually ending in .org, edu or .gov)

 

Presentation

Leave 2 cm margins and double line space your work, so that there is ample space for markers to comment. In addition,

Introduction and Conclusion MUST be included

 

• Font must be 12pt, unless otherwise indicated.
• All pages must be numbered.
• Student name and number must be included in the header or footer of every page of every assignment.
• A title page must accompany your written assessment task and include the subject name and code, title of the assessment task, due date, submission date, lecturer’s name, student name and student number.

 

Requirements

 

Referencing

 

Correct and consistent referencing is an important component of producing professional and credible academic work. Marks will be awarded for high quality referencing.

 

Please refer to the following text for information on how to reference your paper:

 

American Psychological Association (APA). (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington DC: APA.

 

 

Rationale

Subject learning outcomes

This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:

• be able to collect, interpret and document subjective and objective data in the seriously ill or deteriorating person (aligns with Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia National Competency Standards for the Registered Nurse: 1.1, 1.2, 2.5, 4.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 7.4, 8.1, 8.2).
• be able to demonstrate a broad knowledge which links the underlying pathophysiology of serious cardiac, respiratory and neurological presentations to their clinical manifestations (NMBA 2.6, 3.1, 3.4, 4.1, 7.4).
• be able to apply theoretical knowledge, critical thinking and the use of best evidence to contribute to the planning and implementation of appropriate nursing interventions for the person experiencing a serious or life-threatening illness (NMBA 1.2, 2.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 4.1, 6.1, 6.2, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2, 7.4, 7.7, 7.8, 8.1, 8.2, 10.3).
• be able to apply theoretical knowledge to safely perform selected procedural skills including venepuncture, intravenous cannulation, administration of blood products and management of central venous access devices, required for the care of patients experiencing serious or life-threatening illness (NMBA 1.2, 2.5, 7.1, 7.2, 7.4).
• be able to analyse the legal and ethical considerations associated with the management of the deteriorating patient (NMBA 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 9.3, 9.5).
• be able to communicate effectively with individuals, groups and members of the interdisciplinary team in the acute care environment (NMBA 1.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.7, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 9.4, 10.2, 10.4)

 

MARKING CRITERIA

 

1. Applies the Clinical Reasoning Cycle to the Case Study	25.5-30 All of the relevant information from the case study has been accurately applied to each element of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle.	22.5-25   Most of the relevant information from the case study has been accurately applied to each element of the Clinical Reasoning Cycle.	Weighting 30		0-14.5 One or more elements of the clinical reasoning cycle and/or critical information from the case study has been omitted and/or The discussion contains several inaccuracies.	/30
2. Identifies moments of clinical deterioration to plan and justify nursing actions.	25.5-30   Identifies 4 nursing interventions that are safe, evidence-based and appropriate for the relevant moments of deterioration.     Each intervention is supported by a comprehensive and accurate rationale that establishes strong links to the clinical data and Slippery Slope.	22.5-25   Identifies 4 nursing interventions that are safe, evidence-based and appropriate for the relevant moments of deterioration.   Each intervention is supported by a detailed and accurate rationale that clearly explains how it is linked to the clinical data and the Slippery Slope.	Weighting 30		0-14.5 Identifies less than 4 nursing interventions, and/or the interventions identified are unsafe.   Rationales are absent, inadequate or do not consider clinical data and the Slippery Slope.	/30
3. Application of the ISBAR framework to develop handover script.	17 – 20 Comprehensively and concisely communicates all relevant patient information to the interdisciplinary team member using the ISBAR format. Application of ISBAR framework that shows the student has examined and addressed the major issues involved.	15 – 16.5  Comprehensively communicates all relevant patient information to the interdisciplinary team member using the ISBAR format. Application of ISBAR framework that shows the student has explained and addressed the major issues involved.	Weighting 20	10 – 12.5	0 – 9.5  Communicates minimal or irrelevant patient information to the interdisciplinary team member. Handover script does not use ISBAR framework. Handover script evidences an insufficient understanding of the patient’s healthcare needs.	/20
4. Communicates effectively using academic writing and professional language.	8.5-10   Formal academic language and correct professional terminology has been used to create a cohesive, concise and analytical piece of work. The assessment is logically and systematically structured with consistent adherence to grammatical conventions. All presentation guidelines have been applied.	7.5-8   Formal academic language and correct professional terminology has been used to create a cohesive and coherent piece of work. The assessment is logically structured and mostly adheres to grammatical conventions. All presentation guidelines have been applied.	Weighting 10	5-6	0-4.5   Formal and informal language has been used to create a partially structured piece of work that includes multiple grammatical errors impacting on the clarity of the discussion.  Presentation guidelines have not been adhered to.	/10
5. Applies evidence/information from credible sources and with academic integrity	8.5-10 The assessment is supported by an extensive range of current (less than 7 years), peer-reviewed, scholarly sources of health information and research (16 or more appropriate sources), which has been evaluated and synthesised to support all assertions.   APA referencing conventions for both in-text citations and the reference list have been accurately and consistently applied.	7.5-8   The assessment is supported by a wide range of current (less than 7 years), peer-reviewed, scholarly sources of health information and research (14 or more appropriate sources), which have been integrated to support most assertions made.   APA referencing conventions for both in-text citations and the reference list have been almost always accurately and consistently applied.	Weighting 10

 

 

1000 Word Reflection on how the models of attitude formation have shaped students attitudes towards people with disabilities.
Model examples:
– Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
– Three-component model of attitudes by Fazio and Olson (Hogg & Cooper, 2007),
– Fishbein and Ajzen’s 1975 Expectancy-Value Model
etc.1000 Word Reflection on how the models of attitude formation have shaped students attitudes towards people with disabilities.
Model examples:
– Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
– Three-component model of attitudes by Fazio and Olson (Hogg & Cooper, 2007),
– Fishbein and Ajzen’s 1975 Expectancy-Value Model
etc.1000 Word Reflection on how the models of attitude formation have shaped students attitudes towards people with disabilities.
Model examples:
– Maslow’s hierarchy of needs
– Three-component model of attitudes by Fazio and Olson (Hogg & Cooper, 2007),
– Fishbein and Ajzen’s 1975 Expectancy-Value Model
etc.