Book review Instruction

– a 1,500 word commentary on a book  which could be connected to one block in the module and which has advanced the study of memory and history.  The review should critically evaluate the methodology and theoretical framework of the book and assess what contribution it has made to its field of study, in enough depth to be able to situate it in the context of other relevant literature.

The book is: ((The Great War and modern memory)) by Pual  Fussell.

 The Module blocks are ((look which block is the book connected with and consider it when you write the book review)):

1-      Memory, Forgetting and Memoria: the Invention of ‘Memory’

2-      Memory and Identities, Early Modern and Modern

3-       Memory, Media and Popular Culture.

4-       Contentious Memories, the Public and the Media

5-       Clashes and Silences: Contested Public Narratives of the Past in Media and Popular Culture.

6-       Memory, Ghosts and Ruins: Remembering the Visible Past

7-       Memory and Collecting: the Mortimer Collection

Assessment criteria for the book review

• Demonstrates comprehension of the book’s arguments (LO 2, 3)
• Expresses an argument about what contribution the book has made to the study of memory and history (LO 1, 2)
• Situates the book in the context of other relevant literature (LO 1, 2, 3)
• Constructs arguments clearly and coherently (LO 1, 2, 3)
• References and bibliography are complete and accurate (LO 2)

Module Aims

The aims of the module are to:

• introduce students to memory and commemoration as historical issues
• provide students with knowledge and interpretative  approaches to the ‘mnemonic turn’ in history within a series of historical contexts
• cultivate students’ ability to work effectively with primary and secondary source materials

Learning Outcomes ( LO)

On successful completion of this module, students should be able to:

• (LO1) Critically evaluate approaches to memory as an historical concept and tool
• (LO2) Synthesise evidence and interpretation from primary and secondary source material and relate it directly to the opportunities and limitations of the ‘mnemonic turn’
• (LO3) Synthesise knowledge and understanding from multiple topics within the module in order to situate memory as a subject of historical enquiry
• (LO4) Present well-supported arguments about memory and meaning in history in oral form, using appropriate visual aids

Information and introduction about  the Course

Memory, Meaning and History is one of  History Masters modules in which challenges you to explore how historians can understand the past by investigating cross-cutting themes. In the late 20th century, memory started to become a key concept for cultural historians, taking the study of History through what is often referred to as ‘the mnemonic turn’. Memory Studies is now a fully-fledged and interdisciplinary field with its own historiography and a wealth of insights and controversies for anyone who is interested in how humans remember and make sense of the past, taking in not only the memories of the living and the acts of commemoration (and forgetting) that mark the present, but also the question of what historians can know today about memory in the more distant past. Whatever your own specialism, this module will help you situate your interests in debates that range across periods, encouraging you to frame your research in more conceptually ambitious contexts and understand the strengths and limitations of the ‘mnemonic turn’.

Important Notes:

• Do not forget to write footnotes.
• Please connect the book with at least one of the module blocks.
• Please do contact me if you have any question.

Thank you very much.

Develop an accurate and relevant summary of the key strategic factors facing the firm, using the format of a SFAS. To do so, you will draw from the information you developed for the EFAS and IFAS.
Your paper should include a matrix (or table) like the one illustrated on page 167 of the textbook (example attached).
The balance of your paper will be a narrative explaining the strategic factors you selected, the reasons for the weights and ratings, the specific duration for each factor, and any comments (or rationale) for each factor.

Complete and submit an Internal Factor Analysis Summary (IFAS). This assignment includes:
1. Structure: identify the firm’s structure and analyze the fit of the structure with the firm’s strategy.
2. Culture: assess the firm’s culture and the fit of the culture with the firm’s strategy.
3. Management Analysis: Analyze the firm’s key operations management and human resource management characteristics in relation to its strategy.
4. Marketing Analysis: Assess the “4 Ps” and the key marketing strategies of the firm in relation to the firm’s strategy
5. Financial Analysis: Assess the firm’s finances using your choice of financial ratios. Analysis must include Current Ratio, Net Profit Margin, Earnings per Share
6. R&D Analysis: Assess the firm’s R&D capabilities in light of the firm’s strategy.
7. Information Systems Analysis: Assess the firm’s IS capabilities in relation to its strategy.
8. Analysis of Competitive Advantage: Assess the firm’s competitive advantages using a VRIO analysis.
9. Internal Factor Analysis Summary (IFAS): Summarize the results of the above-listed analyses using the IFAS format
For this assignment, you should start with a narrative describing items 1 through 8 above. Essentially, you should devote one paragraph to each item and concisely summarize your conclusions. Subsequently, your paper should include an IFAS table.

This assignment has three components:
1. Alternatives: Develop, present, and analyze several realistic strategic options for the organization.
2. Recommendation: Based on your analysis of the alternatives, provide the recommended strategy for the organization.
3. Justification: Provide a logical justification for the recommended strategy or strategies.This assignment has three components:
1. Alternatives: Develop, present, and analyze several realistic strategic options for the organization.
2. Recommendation: Based on your analysis of the alternatives, provide the recommended strategy for the organization.
3. Justification: Provide a logical justification for the recommended strategy or strategies.This assignment has three components:
1. Alternatives: Develop, present, and analyze several realistic strategic options for the organization.
2. Recommendation: Based on your analysis of the alternatives, provide the recommended strategy for the organization.
3. Justification: Provide a logical justification for the recommended strategy or strategies.

Complete an External Factor Analysis Summary (EFAS) on the assigned case. This assignment has three components:
1. Societal Environmental Analysis: identify key socio-cultural, technological, economic, and political factors in the firm’s external environment.
2. Industry Analysis: use Porter’s 5-forces model to accurately analyze competitive factors in the firm’s industry (or industries) and assess the overall attractiveness of the industry (or industries).
3. External Factor Analysis Summary (EFAS): Summarize the external factors from your societal and industry analyses in an EFAS.
For this assignment, you should start with a narrative explaining your Societal Environmental Analysis (item #1 above) and your Industry Analysis (item #2 above). Subsequently, your paper should include an EFAS table like the one attached

When contrasting the two organisations make sure they are differentiated in Markets ! You can use examples such as Tesco and Amazon or something more interesting

In the 500 word self reflective report you can talk about both Tesco Or Asda as i have worked in both, i will add more content on what to cover

This is my final paper.When contrasting the two organisations make sure they are differentiated in Markets ! You can use examples such as Tesco and Amazon or something more interesting

In the 500 word self reflective report you can talk about both Tesco Or Asda as i have worked in both, i will add more content on what to cover

This is my final paper.

Each student will write a research paper examining a specific criminal justice related topic. The paper is to be scholarly in nature (i.e., not a “reflection” paper). Students must utilize at least 19 sources, 12 of which are peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles. Direct quotations should be used sparingly; however, students may paraphrase material. Paraphrasing still requires proper APA citations. Students are not permitted to reuse any course work from a previous or current course for the purposes of this paper.
General Formatting Requirements
1. A cover page
2. Running Head (upper left-hand corner of the header)
3. Page numbering (upper right-hand corner of the header)
4. 1” margins on all sides
5. Strict double-spacing (no additional space before or after each line – check paragraph settings)
6. Times New Roman, 12 point font throughout your entire paper – cover page through references
7. All text (with the exception of headings within the body of the paper) should be left-justified (i.e., do not “Justify” the text of your paper as the spacing will be off).
8. Written in formal English, with college-level writing mechanics and APA-style formatting, inclusive of in-text citations and references
General Paper Structure: The structure the paper will include four main sections.
I. Introduction
A. Introduce specific topic to be analyzed
B. Provide any relevant historical information pertaining to the respective issue(s), theory (or theories) and policy.
C. Thesis statement – The thesis statement should be a concise and declarative statement illustrating your assessment of the issue (i.e., what you have to say about your chosen topic, what is your position?)
D. Briefly describe your plan of action to analyze your chosen topic, and underscore your thesis (i.e., lay out a “road map” for the reader).
CJ498 2
II. Literature Review (The following describes an integrated literature review)
A. Introduction to your literature review (expand on your “roadmap” statement)

B. Develop subtopics based on your paper topic (about 3). Under each subtopic, provide an in depth analysis of your chosen topic, identified in the introduction, utilizing information garnered from scholarly sources, combined with your own original thoughts (i.e., critical analysis).
1. Summarize prior research
2. Critique prior research
3. Present pertinent conclusions (in brief) – more substantive conclusions will be addressed in Part IV of your paper
C. Provide a summary (i.e., highlights from your literature review) that will naturally lead into your Discussion.
III. Discussion
A. Summarize your assessment of the issue (i.e., chosen topic); the utility of existing theory and data; and the efficacy or futility of current policy in place to address the issue.
B. Reference back to substantive examples from your sources
IV. Conclusion
A. Provide your concluding thoughts on:
1. What policy changes need to be made, and what the implications of those changes might mean with respect to better addressing the issue
2. Future research needs
V. References (APA-style references for all scholarly sources used in your paper)

this paper is about aging throughout the correctional system, and why. What are we doing?
I attached an annotated bibliography that might help.
What are we doing with older inmates? who is caring for them? what about inmates who develop alzheimers? how did three strikes laws and other policies make this situation come to fruition? What can we do now? History on lengthy sentences and mass incarceration- history on aging in corrections. Your own ideas are welcome, what is relevant?
are prisons the new hospice care system? I also included an example of my topic proposal.

Each student will write a research paper examining a specific criminal justice related topic. The paper is to be scholarly in nature (i.e., not a “reflection” paper). Students must utilize at least 19 sources, 12 of which are peer-reviewed scholarly journal articles. Direct quotations should be used sparingly; however, students may paraphrase material. Paraphrasing still requires proper APA citations. Students are not permitted to reuse any course work from a previous or current course for the purposes of this paper.
General Formatting Requirements
1. A cover page
2. Running Head (upper left-hand corner of the header)
3. Page numbering (upper right-hand corner of the header)
4. 1” margins on all sides
5. Strict double-spacing (no additional space before or after each line – check paragraph settings)
6. Times New Roman, 12 point font throughout your entire paper – cover page through references
7. All text (with the exception of headings within the body of the paper) should be left-justified (i.e., do not “Justify” the text of your paper as the spacing will be off).
8. Written in formal English, with college-level writing mechanics and APA-style formatting, inclusive of in-text citations and references
General Paper Structure: The structure the paper will include four main sections.
I. Introduction
A. Introduce specific topic to be analyzed
B. Provide any relevant historical information pertaining to the respective issue(s), theory (or theories) and policy.
C. Thesis statement – The thesis statement should be a concise and declarative statement illustrating your assessment of the issue (i.e., what you have to say about your chosen topic, what is your position?)
D. Briefly describe your plan of action to analyze your chosen topic, and underscore your thesis (i.e., lay out a “road map” for the reader).
CJ498 2
II. Literature Review (The following describes an integrated literature review)
A. Introduction to your literature review (expand on your “roadmap” statement)

B. Develop subtopics based on your paper topic (about 3). Under each subtopic, provide an in depth analysis of your chosen topic, identified in the introduction, utilizing information garnered from scholarly sources, combined with your own original thoughts (i.e., critical analysis).
1. Summarize prior research
2. Critique prior research
3. Present pertinent conclusions (in brief) – more substantive conclusions will be addressed in Part IV of your paper
C. Provide a summary (i.e., highlights from your literature review) that will naturally lead into your Discussion.
III. Discussion
A. Summarize your assessment of the issue (i.e., chosen topic); the utility of existing theory and data; and the efficacy or futility of current policy in place to address the issue.
B. Reference back to substantive examples from your sources
IV. Conclusion
A. Provide your concluding thoughts on:
1. What policy changes need to be made, and what the implications of those changes might mean with respect to better addressing the issue
2. Future research needs
V. References (APA-style references for all scholarly sources used in your paper)

this paper is about aging throughout the correctional system, and why. What are we doing?
I attached an annotated bibliography that might help.
What are we doing with older inmates? who is caring for them? what about inmates who develop alzheimers? how did three strikes laws and other policies make this situation come to fruition? What can we do now? History on lengthy sentences and mass incarceration- history on aging in corrections. Your own ideas are welcome, what is relevant?
are prisons the new hospice care system? I also included an example of my topic proposal.

‘Criminology and criminological theories focus too much on the petty wrongdoing of relatively powerless individuals and social groups. They should focus more on the wrongs and harms of the powerful.’
Critically discuss this statement, drawing upon relevant concepts and examples to illustrate your arguments.

– MUST USE OSCOLA REFERENCING.
Use between 20 and 30 references (whatever you see fit).

Word count includes footnotes, though excludes bibliography.‘Criminology and criminological theories focus too much on the petty wrongdoing of relatively powerless individuals and social groups. They should focus more on the wrongs and harms of the powerful.’
Critically discuss this statement, drawing upon relevant concepts and examples to illustrate your arguments.

– MUST USE OSCOLA REFERENCING.
Use between 20 and 30 references (whatever you see fit).

Word count includes footnotes, though excludes bibliography.