STRATEGIC MOVES, TIMING, AND SCOPE OF OPERATIONS

Book:Essentials of Strategic Management: The Quest for Competitive Advantage by Gamble, Peteraf,
and Thompson, Jr.

Chapter 6
Please follow the instructions.
Among other topics, this week’s chapter covers mergers and acquisitions. For this week’s
Strategy in Practice assignment, you are charged with finding a contemporary news article, from
a reliable source, that discusses a merger or acquisition that has recently been announced, is
currently in progress, or has just been finalized. The article that you select must be one published
within the last four (4) months. Write at least 200 words summarizing the article and at least 500
words explaining how it ties into the material presented in Chapter 6. Provide, in the Works
Cited section, the full citation (do not include the article) for your selected article, including the
URL, if applicable.
Fully discuss the selected merger or acquisition, and include as much pertinent information as
necessary, both from the text and from your own research, to thoroughly describe the strategic
ramifications of the transaction, the impact of the deal on the industry(ies), and the advantages
and disadvantages of the strategic choice discussed in the article.
Remember that your article must be current, and your discussion must be comprehensive.

Water births

You must conduct a research report and as a result develop a range of actions that can be implemented within your own field of practice. Your field of practice may relate to the field in which you intend to work after graduating. You need to identify the areas in which you will conduct your research and write a report on the problems, issues, or hypothesis that you will be exploring. Write a report, detailing the research project, and any conclusions or recommendations. I have attached the assessment details and there are questions that need to be answered under subheadings. Please make sure all questions are addressed in detail. 7 APA peer reviewed references are required no later then 5 years old (2013). 1200-1500 words. I have attached all the questions and the marking guide I will be assessed on, if you could please read through.

J&J company quality issues

Overview
You instructor will put you in a group of two or three colleagues to work on solving a quality problem in a real-world environment.
By week 2, your team will need to select a specific organization of interest to you and identify a quality management related problem(s) in the firm. Examples may be poor quality levels, the high cost of quality, poor product or service design, high levels of internal or external failures, and so on. Feel free to add to this list if you need to. Be sure to select a company that is well known and has public information about quality issues.
Your team is taking on the role as a quality management consultant company, and the executives of your chosen organization have asked your team to submit a recommended direction to implement a quality management initiative to address the quality management related problem(s) you identified above (e.g., Six Sigma, lean principles, TQM, SPC, balanced scorecard, etc.).
You also need to identify which of the course COs and specific topics in the Syllabus are related to the problem you identify.
You will submit the following deliverables throughout the course:
– Problem Statement Video (Week 3, 60 Pts)
– PowerPoint Video of Final Quality Report (Week 7, 100 pts)
– Final Quality Paper (Week 8, 140 pts)

Week 8 – Final Paper (140 pts)
In week 8, one of your team member’s will submit your written paper for grading. Here are the guidelines for your final report. (Only one submission per team is required)
Topic Selection
1. Select a specific organization of interest to your team and identify a quality management related problem(s) in the firm. Examples may be poor quality levels, high cost of quality, poor product or service design, high levels of internal or external failures, and so on. Feel free to add to this list if you need to.
2. Your team is taking on the role as a quality management consultant firm and the executives of your chosen organization have asked you to submit a recommended direction to implement a quality management initiative to address the quality management related problem(s) you identified above (e.g., Six Sigma, lean principles, TQM, SPC, balanced scorecard, etc.).
3. Your group will need to identify which of the course TCOs and specific topics in the Syllabus are related to the problem you identify.
Research Sources
1. All papers must have a minimum of eight scholarly sources (other than textbook) cited within the text of the paper and identified in the References section.
2. Additional research sources can be attached in an appendix.
3. All sources must be in two place: They need to be identified in the References section and must also have a corresponding citation in the body of the paper.
4. To access and use EBSCOhost for your research, use this link: http://proxy.devry.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip&custid=ns123107
• All resources for the paper should come from the DeVry library and must be of scholarly/journal quality.
• Use the librarians for assistance in accessing materials.
Please note: Articles found online (consulting company websites, Internet magazines, or other blogs) will not be considered acceptable scholarly resources. Conduct your research through a library where you can be assured that the sources are of scholarly quality. For example, please do not use Wikipedia!

Paper Format
1. All papers should be single sided, double spaced, and written in 12-point Times New Roman font.
2. The paper should be between 10 and 12 pages, excluding the cover page, reference pages, and appendices.
3. The first page should include the title of the work, student name, address, telephone and e-mail address, course number, date, and instructor’s name.
4. Follow APA style for general format and citations.
5. Paper sections must adhere to the guidelines below and each section must be labeled in the text.
6. The language should be clear, concise, and precise.
7. The tone should be professional, consistent, and not filled with jargon.
8. Grammar and syntax (sentence structure) must be correct.
9. The report must be free of misspellings and typos.

Post an explanation of the primary diagnosis, as well as 3 differential diagnoses, for the patient in the case study that you selected or were assigned. Describe the role the patient history and physical exam played in the diagnosis. Then, suggest potential treatment options based on your patient diagnosis.

Case Study 1
A 52-year-old African American male presents to an urgent care center complaining of urinary frequency and nocturia. The symptoms have been present for several months and have increased in frequency over the past week. He has been unable to sleep because of the need to urinate at least hourly all day and night. He does not have a primary care provider and has not seen a doctor in more than 10 years. His father died when he was a child in an automobile accident, and his mother is 79 years old and has hypertension. The patient has no siblings. His social history includes the following: banker by profession, divorced father of two grown children, non-smoker, and occasionally consumes alcohol on weekends only.

Instructions:
Post an explanation of the primary diagnosis, as well as 3 differential diagnoses, for the patient in the case study that you selected or were assigned. Describe the role the patient history and physical exam played in the diagnosis. Then, suggest potential treatment options based on your patient diagnosis.

Construct a memo in the form of a posting to communicate a change in proceedure. In your initial post, include the memo.

Construct a memo in the form of a posting to communicate a change in proceedure. In your initial post, include the memo. Then discuss the following:
• How would you communicate this project in the upward, downward, horizontal, and diagonal channels?
• Explain your strategies and provide evidence of support from your readings or literature.
• Discuss grapevine communication networks that exist and make recommendations of how you would ensure accurate information is communicated through this method.
Support your discussion and opinions with facts, relevant examples from personal nursing practice, and at least two citations from the reading or peer-reviewed professional nursing literature. Remember to use APA 6th edition formatting for all discussion posts and reference citations.

Research on Casual Footwear industry

External-industry industry competitive dynamics, supply-side dynamics and business models on the casual footwear industry, as a whole. For the business model, use common business model of casual footwear industry and not the whole footwear industry.

By dynamics, your job is to document changes happening (or likely to happen) with competitors, suppliers, business model in this industry.

And after talking about the whole industry, mention about how Crocs is doing on supply-side and business models. Overall, relate back with what crocs is doing for all three points.

This is the group project and I will provide the whole project rubric, so that the writer can have better idea on what he is doing. On this, you only have to work on External-industry industry competitive dynamics, supply-side dynamics and business models

Youth and crime

The concept of Restorative Justice revolves around the desirability of re-integrating the offender (for our purposes, the juvenile offender) back into the community in such a way as to lessen the likelihood of re-offending. Restorative Justice seeks to build accommodation among the juvenile offender, the victim (if there is one) and the community. All three parties have to “buy in” to the process in order for it to work. And by the term “work” we mean reducing recidivism.
This would appear on its face to be a noble effort. The question is: Does it work? Restorative Justice techniques are now being implemented by various communities, schools, Police Departments, and the juvenile courts. The State of Vermont, for example, has done much in this area. Your assignment here is to familiarize yourself with programs such as Vermont’s “Restorative Justice Panels.” How do they operate? Do they work for juveniles? Where do they fall short, if in fact they do? What suggestions might you propose to improve the operation of these Panels for juveniles? You may wish to review the proposed program set out in your text, at the end of Chapter 5, under the heading of “Viewpoint.”
Assume for the purposes of this exercise that you are an expert in juvenile justice and have been asked by the powers that be for your opinion and recommendations. How would you evaluate the (1) desirability, and (2) the effectiveness of such programs in particular, and in the concept of Restorative Justice in general. In other words, is it worth the effort?

Professor Avery mentioned that the heart and soul of thinking sociologically is to “make the familiar strange” and “question what seems obvious.” What do you think he meant by that? What does it mean to make the familiar strange? What does it mean to question what seems obvious? Why is that important to do?

Professor Avery mentioned that the heart and soul of thinking sociologically is to “make the familiar strange” and “question what seems obvious.” What do you think he meant by that? What does it mean to make the familiar strange? What does it mean to question what seems obvious? Why is that important to do?

In writing up your response, please reference at least one of the course readings that was assigned this week (“Degree by Default” and “Anti Social Debts”) as well as material presented during lecture. Don’t forget to do that! Points will be taken off for failing to reference reading/lecture material.

You can write the essay in the first person, and feel free to use either APA or MLA style for referencing materials.

On the document header, please clearly indicate that you are responding to “Essay 1A” and make sure the file you submit is .doc, .docx, or .pdf.

Your response must be between 600-700 words. Submit your finished responses to our Canvas assignments dropbox, “Essay 1” before 9am, Friday, October 12th.

These formatting requirements are listed in our course syllabus:

“In the upper left hand corner of the first page of the document, please
include: (1) your first and last name; (2) student ID #; (3) the course
title (SOC 1); (4) the date; and (5) the word count. Please follow those
instructions carefully. Failure to do so can result in a grade
reduction.”

Leadership Case Study

Purpose: To demonstrate understanding of leadership concepts through research and contextual application of those concepts; further develop critical thinking skills; further develop scholarly research skills; demonstration of competency in college-level written communication and APA Style.

Choose a leader you admire. It may be an historical, contemporary, or fictional leader. (We will discuss potential leaders and I will give approval to your choice in one of our weekly discussion boards.) Research and write your own case examining the leadership qualities, styles, and challenges of the leader you choose. Use the title: What makes a leader ___: Name of Leader (substituting the appropriate word for the blank and using the name of the leader you selected).
Use selections from the leader’s writings, if available, and other scholarly sources (including relevant news stories from reputable sources) that can help you to create a profile of the leader as well as a sense of why you see the leader as an example of the word or words that fill in the blank. Have a strong central thesis that you support with examples from the leader’s life and work. If using a fictional leader, assume the fictional narrative is the leader’s life/work.
Each case must be 3-5 pages of content
title page + 3-5 pages of content + reference page = 5-7 total pages
You must cite academic sources from the course readings or other scholarly literature to provide support and/or definitions and explanations of the topics within your case. It will not be sufficient to simply write from your own perspective and opinion without support from the literature. You may include sources from the course readings. Additional citations from other research and course readings are expected, but there is not a maximum number expected.
Avoid over quoting your research sources. No quotes over 40 words and do not present a simple string of quotes within your paragraphs. Paraphrase and synthesize.
All written assignments should be carefully proofed for grammar, spelling, sentence structure, typographical errors, and punctuation prior to submission.
*I’d like it to be on Colin Powell
*Must have title page and works cited/reference page
*If you have questions please ask

For this assignment, you are to write a 1200- to 2000-word essay. Your essay must identify and assess crime scene requirements as to special needs and support logistics, to include, but not limited to, the needs and materials to establish proper search procedures and patterns, identify hazardous materials and situations, and considerations specific to mass crime scenes. Consider how you would handle these related multiple crime scenes as if you were in Major Susan Barker’s shoes.

Scenario
The DRNC is a five-day event that takes over a year to plan for. The epicenter of the convention is
located at the American Airlines Arena (also known as the “Triple A”) in Downtown Miami. A buffer zone
has been erected around the arena, as well as the entire Bayside and Bayfront Park areas, and the
Intercontinental Hotel. The area inside the buffer zone is considered as the “security zone” and is where
the delegates who attend the convention will have free access. The security zone extends to the waters
of Biscayne Bay, and includes the entire Port of Miami.
Entry into the secure zone is strictly monitored at four locations along the buffer zone perimeter. Only
persons with the proper credentials are allowed into the security zone. Two of the four entry/exit gates are
located at the AAA, and the west gate into the Intercontinental Hotel grounds. The other two access
points into the secure zone are from the dockyard at the east side of the AAA, and the pier at the east
side of the Intercontinental Hotel. These two access points are for pre-screened ferry boats that help to
shuttle the delegates from the hotel to the AAA arena. All persons (including on-duty law enforcement
personnel) must be screened prior to entry into the security zone. The screening involves a multi-stop
queue whereby all vehicles and persons entering the security zone are subjected to an X-ray examination
(VACIS machine for vehicles), magnetometers, explosive detection K-9s, and a physical pat down
search. In addition, SWAT team counter-snipers are placed at high locations at various places in order to
prevent any terrorist bombers (and their vehicles) from getting access into the security zone. This
screening process is one of the strictest and most elaborate in the world, yet it is not completely infallible.
There have been several accounts of people getting past the security gates, into the security zone during
previous Super Bowls and political conventions. So far, the intruders have been non-terrorists.
One week prior to the start of the DRNC in early August, a team of 40 K-9 officers and their dogs swept
every inch of the AAA and its surrounding property. These K-9 officers came from all parts of Florida, as
well as a few federal agencies from Washington, D.C. Immediately after sweeping certain areas in and
around the AAA, security guards were posted on a 24-hour basis to make sure that no explosive devices
would be placed after the sweep. Once the K-9 team’s commander felt comfortable that the areas had
been secured, a guard would be posted and then the K-9s would go onto somewhere else to sweep
another critical area (such as the Intercontinental Hotel).
The police were not the only ones who were getting ready the week prior to the start of the DRNC event.
It appears that some adversarial groups were getting ready as well. Five days before the DRNC, the
Bomb Management Center (located at the Broward County Emergency Operations Center) received a
barrage of suspicious device calls (i.e., bombs) at various locations in Miami-Dade County. The MiamiDade
Bomb Squad responded to seven different calls in which backpacks had been abandoned in the
Downtown Miami area (outside the exclusionary area). One of them turned out to be the belongings of a
homeless person who slept under the Metrorail station in Overtown. However, the other six turned out to
be elaborate hoax devices. All six of these devices were determined by the bomb techs to be inert, and
posed no danger of explosion. Nevertheless, the fact that so many hoax devices were turning up during
the week prior to the DRNC was somewhat troublesome.
That week, Tim Johnson the FBI Supervisory Special Agent, and lead worker of the Miami JTTF, called
an impromptu meeting at the South Florida Fusion Center, located in Broward County to discuss the
recent rash of hoax bomb calls. Also present at the meeting were Mary Straight (Fusion Center Chief
Analyst), Detective Mike Warner (MDPD and JTTF member), Detective Frank Gomez (City of Miami PD,
and JTTF member), Detective Josh Marcussen (Broward Sheriff’s Office, and JTTF member), and
Detective Fred White (Palm Beach SO, and JTTF member). Sergeant James Boyd of the Miami-Dade PD
Bomb Squad was also invited and asked to debrief the JTTF investigators regarding the hoax devices.
At the onset of the meeting, Tim Johnson asked Sergeant Boyd to describe the six hoax devices that
were found at various locations around Downtown. Sergeant Boyd reported that in his opinion, all six
hoax devices were very similar in composition, and were likely constructed by the same person. Next,
Mary Straight reported that in five of the six hoax bomb cases had been captured on video from the pole
cameras in the Downtown area.
Several months before the DRNC, pole video cameras were placed at almost every corner of Downtown
Miami. These high resolution cameras covered almost every conceivable angle in the Downtown area,
and could be zoomed in to get a fairly clear picture of individual peoples’ faces. It is fairly well known
within law enforcement and security realms that hired personnel cannot conceivably monitor every
possible angle that these cameras reached. However, some new software advances had made the task
of video surveillance much better in that the software was programed to sense when items had been left
behind by suspects. If after 10 seconds the item had not been recovered by a person, then the alarm at
the video monitoring station would sound, and the attention of the security monitor would be brought to
that screen. This was an excellent surveillance tool that had been first used at a large scale special event
during the 2007 Super Bowl in Miami.
Mary passed out printed handouts of close-up screen capture photos of the two subjects who had
dropped off the hoax devices in five out of the six cases. Mary stated, “we have run these two through our
facial recognition software, and compared them to all of our data banks, but we don’t have any matches
so far. All I can tell you so far is that these guys are white males, about 5’ 6” and both weighing about 140
pounds.”
“Geez…these two guys look almost like the two Boston Marathon bombers,” stated Johnson. They’re
dressed the same, and even their faces are similar. If I didn’t know better, I would say that those two had
been resurrected.”
“Well…they haven’t been resurrected, but it looks like these two guys have resurrected the idea,”
remarked Mary. “We don’t have any other leads on these two at the moment…and we don’t know if
they’re just Anarchist hoaxers who are doing this to spread our bomb squad resources thin, or whether
these guys are serious bombers. There’s no way to tell right now.”
Sergeant Boyd interrupted, “yeah…even though these were all hoax devices, let’s not discount the
possibility that these subjects are real bombers who are placing these hoax devices to see how we
respond to them. Every time that we go to a bomb call, we are always wary that someone is watching us
and our procedures.”
“Agreed,” said Johnson. “We need to have a couple of surveillance teams on the ground in case these
guys show up again. If we find them…we’ll tail them for a while and try to find out if they’re working alone,
or as part of a larger group. I already have Detective Phil Herrera’s surveillance team on standby in
Downtown Miami from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., and Tom Sullivan’s team from the Tampa JTTF is handling the
evening shift.”
Detective Mike Warner asked, “Tim…what are your thoughts of putting out a press release to the public
with these guys’ picture on it like they did up in Boston for the Marathon bombers?”
“Mike, we may have to that eventually, but I think it’s premature at this point. Even if a concerned citizen
who knows their identity reported them to us, we don’t have much in the way of criminal charges against
them.”
“That’s true, but at least we can nail them on State charges related to the building and possession of hoax
devices,” replied Warner.
“You make a good point Mike, but let’s try to find them with our surveillance teams first…and if we don’t
do it within the next two days, then we’ll release the information and pictures to the public and try that
route. If we do the press release now, these two guys will know that we’re looking for them, and they may
take off to who knows where. So far, none of the devices contained any explosives, so I don’t view this as
an imminent threat to the public.”
Warner responded, “OK…I see your point, and I agree with what you’re saying. However, if by Monday
morning we haven’t found these guys, then I think we need to alert the public.” Warner turned to Sergeant
Boyd and asked, “Jim, we’ll need your Bomb Squad on standby all weekend, in case we find these guys
and they lead us to their stash of bomb making materials.”
“No problem Mike. In fact, all six of my guys are already assigned to ad hoc J-HRT teams and their days
off have been cancelled until the DRNC is over,” replied Sergeant Boyd. With that, the meeting at the
South Florida Fusion Center concluded.
Five Days Later (Monday, the first day of the DRNC event)
It was early Monday morning…the first day of the DRNC event in Downtown Miami. Supervisory Special
Agent Tim Johnson called another meeting of the JTTF.
Johnson started the meeting, “alright…so far the surveillance teams or the cameras have not picked up
on the two subjects that we’ve been looking for. I think it’s time to release the subjects’ pictures to the
public and seek their assistance.”
Detective Warner interrupted, “Tim, I just got a text message from the Bomb Squad sergeant. He said that
his bomb squad got called out late Sunday night for five separate suspicious package calls at various
Metrorail stations. According to Jim Boyd, so far his teams have rendered safe three out of the five, and
this time no hoax devices…all of them turned out to be real bombs.”
Johnson stated, “it sounds like we have some real live bombers on our hand. Mary, do we have anything
on video this time?”
Analyst Mary Straight answered, “yes we do…as a matter of a fact, that’s how one of the calls for the
Bomb Squad came from. We have a video of the same two guys…wearing the same clothing as last
week…dropping off a backpack at the train level of the Overtown Metrorail station. Unfortunately, by the
time we got a hold of the surveillance team on the ground, the two guys disappeared and we have
nothing on their location or direction of travel.”
“Well I guess it’s time to release the information to the public,” said Johnson.
“Tim…I just got additional information from the Bomb Squad sergeant. He’s now telling me that two other
devices have detonated…one south in the Vizcaya Metrorail station, and another north of Downtown, in
the Earlington Heights Metrorail. Apparently, there have been many casualties…as many as 100 dead or
injured…it’s too early to say,” said Detective Warner.
“OK…I’m hearing the same thing from my sources,” stated Detective Frank Gomez (City of Miami PD).
“Over a hundred casualties…mostly Metrorail commuters…It looks like many of the injured at the Vizcaya
station are being transported to South Miami Hospital. The injured persons from the Earlington Heights
explosion are being transported to Jackson Memorial Hospital’s trauma unit.”
“OK…it sounds like we have at least five…maybe seven different crime scenes…not counting the two
hospitals,” stated Detective Warren. “I’ll get a hold of Major Susan Barker, who’s in charge of the joint
forensic teams that have assembled for the event. They’re going to have their hands full with so many
different crime scenes. I hope she has enough people on her teams.”
“Mary…can you please get a hold of our Joint Information Center (JIC) and give them the press release
that we put together last week?”
Mary Straight nodded in agreement, but then said, “are you sure you want to release this information right
now? You realize that the reporters are going to ask a lot of questions, and they are sure to ask why we
didn’t release the information last week, when we first had it.”
“Mary, I realize that we will come under a lot of scrutiny for not having released the pictures earlier…but
let me deal with that later. Right now we need to find these two guys as soon as possible.”
Assignment Instructions
For this assignment, you are to write a 1200- to 2000-word essay. Your essay must identify and assess
crime scene requirements as to special needs and support logistics, to include, but not limited to, the
needs and materials to establish proper search procedures and patterns, identify hazardous materials
and situations, and considerations specific to mass crime scenes. Consider how you would handle these
related multiple crime scenes as if you were in Major Susan Barker’s shoes.