How to Read a Monograph

*5 total songs for the assignment required

Monograph: 12 Years a Slave by Solomon Northup

create a mixtape that does the following:
DESCRIBES the monograph and sets it in historical context;
ANALYZES some aspect of the monograph from a historical point of view (see below for ideas);
CONSIDERS the benefits and limitations of the monograph as historical evidence
And PROPOSES some unanswered questions that this assignment has left you with.

Use Chicago Style for any citations within the paper.

Read the monograph in its entirety.

Then you will create a soundtrack for your chosen monograph by the following method:

Title of the song and artist.

Summarize the scene from the book where you would use the song (2-3 sentences).

Discuss why you chose this song for the specific scene you summarize. Here, talk about what aspects of the song (music, lyrics, tone, etc) correspond to the passage you summarize (3-4 sentences).

Make sure you cite the pages from the text in the summary and or the discussion. You must have five songs and five passages.

DESCRIBES the monograph and sets it in historical context; ( in at least one paragraph)
ANALYZES some aspect of the monograph from a historical point of view (in at least one paragraph);

Choose a reading or two from our syllabus that interests (intrigues, bothers, or confuses) you. If you choose to use two readings, keep in mind the following: papers that analyze works published around the same time period tend to result in stronger essays than the essays that analyze works from radically different time periods; and comparative papers (papers using two readings) are easier follow if you analyze one work and THEN the other rather than alternating back and forth between the two.

Final Paper
English 221

Your final paper should be 5 pages, double-spaced, 12 pt. font. No long headers. No title page. All you will have at the top of the first page, centered, is a creative title and then your name, in that order. The rest of the first page and all subsequent pages should be your paper. Below you will find all the details for your assignment.

For this final paper you should show how one or two of our readings advance(s), critique(s), or amends(s) our understanding of one of the terms we have touched on this semester. Your essay should argue that this work or works theorize(s) this term in a new way. Put another way, you should illustrate how this work or works allow(s) us to recover a different definition of this term.

Possible terms to use for the paper include (but are not limited to) the following:

Colonialism
Settler Colonialism
Black Legend
Apology
Frontier
Puritanism
Separatism
Indigenous
Covenant
Race
Enlightenment
Romanticism
Federalist
Republican
Nation
History
Neoclassical
Jeremiad
Captivity
Imperialism
Revolution
Sentimentalism
Capitalism
Author
Poetry
Fiction
Satire
Gothic
Masculinity
Femininity
Autobiography
Commons

Here is how you should approach the paper:

Choose a reading or two from our syllabus that interests (intrigues, bothers, or confuses) you. If you choose to use two readings, keep in mind the following: papers that analyze works published around the same time period tend to result in stronger essays than the essays that analyze works from radically different time periods; and comparative papers (papers using two readings) are easier follow if you analyze one work and THEN the other rather than alternating back and forth between the two.

Choose a relevant critical term

Begin taking relevant examples from the readings and start to structure your paper based on YOUR interpretation of those examples

Try to come up with a working thesis about what the work or works illustrates about your term.

Remember: The majority (~80%) of the paper should be detailed literary analysis, which is clear and well organized. Make sure you clarify the significance of key words or phrases, recurring tropes, metaphors, etc. in the passages you cite.

The introduction and conclusion (20~%) will serve to frame your analysis. For the introduction, you will need a good dictionary. The Oxford English Dictionary is your best bet. It is available online through the UNA library website (go to the library search engine, then go to search, Databases by Title, then search under the letter O). The paper’s introduction should include (in quotation marks) one of the dictionary’s definitions of your key term, which should be contextualized and properly situated in this paragraph. Treat your introduction as a place for connecting the dots between this definition, the work or works you analyze, and your thesis or argument.

Work for substantial body paragraphs (7-10 sentences) throughout the paper. Remember that short paragraphs likely mean that you have not fleshed out your paragraph’s main idea.

Other strategies:
Share your thesis with a friend. See if he/she has any ideas for making it more argumentative or for more making it clearer.
Take the paper to the writing center for specific help.

**No need to include a works cited page, but note that I do run suspect writing through an online search. Use quotation marks when you use any language that is not your own.

For this assignment, you will write a research paper exploring the Ministry of Health’s vision and strategy to improve healthcare delivery for all citizens throughout the Kingdom.

Implementing Quality as the Core Organizational Strategy

For this assignment, you will write a research paper exploring the Ministry of Health’s vision and strategy to improve healthcare delivery for all citizens throughout the Kingdom.

Choose three out of the four topics below:

Interoperable electronic health records,
Equitable care standards,
Quality and performance standards, or
Governance and accountability.
For each selected topic:

Provide an overview of the MOH vision and strategy for that topic.
Explain the importance of the topic and how it will improve healthcare quality and safety in Saudi Arabia.
Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

Four pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages.
Formatted per APA and University standards.
Provide support for your work with in-text citations from a minimum of four scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but two must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these references.
Provide full APA references for the sources used, along with appropriate in-text citations.
Utilize headings to organize the content in your work.

“Under Hoover, The Shame and Misery Deepened.”

This is a reading essay from Portrait of America. The article I am choosing from the book is “Under Hoover, The Shame and Misery Deepened.” There must be one quoted, cited sentence from the reading material in each paragraph. At the conclusion of each article in the readings book, you will find a list of “Questions to Consider.”
Select two numbered blocks or paragraphs of questions at the end of the article and answer your hat block of questions from the material in the reading assignment utilizing both critical and creative evaluation and thinking. At the TOP of the first page, reproduce in Italics the chosen numbered blocks or paragraphs of questions, word for word. Here is the link to the article for this paper. https://www.groton.k12.ct.us/site/handlers/filedownload.ashx?moduleinstanceid=3978&dataid=13394&FileName=Under%20Hoover.pdf

INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING

Question 1
(a)The definition of an asset and a liability
forms an important element of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting 2010, which in turn, forms the basis of various accounting standards.
Required:
Define an asset and a liability and critically evaluate the circumstances under which they should
be recognised in the financial statements as required by the conceptual framework. Give a critical explanation of how the definition of assets and liabilities may enhance the reliability of financial statements

(b) On 1 January 2015 Rogers acq
uired a plan under the following terms:

Hours
£000
Manufacturer’s list price –1,200
Trade discount (applying to list price only)–20%
Freight charges –26
In-transit insurance–4
Staff training in use of machine –40
Electrical installation cost –17
Site preparation –34
Pre-production testing–33
Purchase of a three -year maintenance contract–15
Estimated residual value–100
Estimated life in machine hours–5,000
Hours used:
Years ended 31 December 2015–1500
Years ended 31 December 2016–1900

Required:
Prepare extracts from the statements of comprehensive income and
statement of financial position for the plant for each of the two years to 31 December 2016 .

Question 2

IAS 17 Leases
(i)
By using the regulatory discussions and relevant international accounting standards (IASs) which are taught in the module APC311, you are required to provide a critical evaluation of IAS 17 Leases.
(ii)
Pamela Ltd entered a five-year lease on 1 January 2010 for a machine
with a fair value of £20,000. Rentals are £5,200 per annum payable in advance. The residual value of the machine at the end of the lease is estimated to be £4,200. Pamela Ltd will be reimbursed with this £4,200 on returning the machine to the lessor in reasonable condition. Peter Ltd is responsible for insurance and maintenance costs. The rate of interest implicit in the lease is 15.15%

Required:
Calculate the annual finance charges on a sum of the digits basis and on an actuarial basis. Comment on the results

DSRIP Workforce

DSRIP Workforce 101- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyobdAU60fU&feature=youtu.be
1. Organized statement by objectives. Develops statement related to objectives to facilitate discussion. Ability to generate or stimulate group discussion.
2. Statements are characterized by clarity of argument, depth of insight into content, relevancy, and insight. Arguments and facts are supported by required video or readings and current events.
3. Does where you work at NYU Winthrop Hospital have and or support DSRIP?
4. Summarized DSRIP video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyobdAU60fU&feature=youtu.be
5. What is the advantage and disadvantage DSRIP?
6. Who will gain and lose from DSRIP?
7. What are the strength and weakness of DSRIP?
8. Where do you see DSRIP in 5 years and ten years?
9. What valid and invalid role does DSRIP play and why?
10. Who are the interest groups involved in DSRIP? Why and how are the involved and benefit?
Please put the numbers so I can see the answered question above. If you used to support evidence aside from the video, please provide proof of the video and outside source in APA style.

Global Access to Essential Health Commodities

Global Access to Essential Health Commodities

Research the access to essential health commodities. Medical innovations are failing many patients globally. Describe the issues, barriers, and challenges for the neglected populations. Discuss how access can be expanded for these populations, what policy changes are needed, and who needs to be participating in solving this problem.

Please use the following headings in your paper:

Introduction
Essential Health Commodities
The Failure of Medical Innovations
Issues, Barriers, and Challenges
Recommended Policy Changes
Conclusions
References
Your paper should meet the following structural requirements:

Be 3 pages in length, not including the cover or reference pages.
Be formatted according to University and APA writing guidelines.
Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but four must be external.
Utilize headings to organize the content in your work.

Old is a relative measure of time, yet it conveys strong, mostly negative impressions. How might these attitudes about old affect one’s attitudes about growing old? About being with older people? How might negative attitudes about aging influence public policy, health careers and social programs for older people?

Part A:

People of all ages commonly hold negative attitudes about aging. This assignment introduces the topic of aging and ageism by having you examine your own stereotypes about older people.

Draw a circle on a piece of paper with the word young in the middle of the circle. Next, write all of the words that come to mind regarding youth around the outside of the circle.

Repeat the circle association in step 1 – only this time use the word old instead of young.

Then think about the following:

– What do you notice about attitudes toward younger people vs. older people?
– In what situations have you felt people prejudge you because of your age?
– How have negative attitudes affected how you feel or what you do?
– How have positive attitudes about young people helped you?
– Did you find any similarities between your young and old circles?
– Have you ever experienced or known anyone who experienced prejudice or discrimination based on age? (Possible occasions for age discrimination are when applying for a job, renting an apartment, or trying to participate in an activity intended for another age group.)

Think about attitudes toward older people. What kind of negative and positive connotations does the word old have?

We will never know what it is like to be a different gender or a different race but we hope, however, that we will all know what it is like to be old.

Part B:
TASK: Thinking about information in the text and your personal results from this exercise address the following questions in your response.

– Old is a relative measure of time, yet it conveys strong, mostly negative impressions. How might these attitudes about old affect one’s attitudes about growing old? About being with older people? How might negative attitudes about aging influence public policy, health careers and social programs for older people?

For this assignment, you will develop a rebuttal while examining a position taken on a podcast episode.

For this assignment, you will develop a rebuttal while examining a position taken on a podcast episode.

Step One:
I have chosen two podcasts for you to explore that discuss a concept or event and present a position that is unique and unconventional. Your first task is to review the following websites and review the episode lists. When you find a title that interests you, read the episode description. If you are still intrigued, then listen and enjoy. If the podcast creators present an argument that you want to refute, then you are ready for the next step. If not, then you need to find another episode. Note: You should not have to restart the process more than once or twice if you read the episode descriptions very carefully.

http://revisionisthistory.com/ — “Each week for 10 weeks, Revisionist History will go back and reinterpret something from the past: an event, a person, an idea. Something overlooked. Something misunderstood.”

http://freakonomics.com/about/where-to-listen-to-the-podcast/ — “Have fun discovering the hidden side of everything with host Stephen J. Dubner, co-author of the best-selling “Freakonomics” books. Each week, hear surprising conversations that explore the riddles of everyday life and the weird wrinkles of human nature—from cheating and crime to parenting and sports.”

Step Two:
Once you have chosen your podcast episode, you are ready to post your rebuttal.

1. At the top of your post, please include the link to your podcast episode. You can post the link by using one of the icons on the post menu bar. Once you have copied the episode URL, click on the icon that looks like two connected links and paste the URL to the text box and click on “Insert Link.”

2. Now, please post your response to the following questions (approx. 200 words).

– What claim is the podcast making?

– What logical fallacies are utilized why making this claim?

– What type of support is missing from the argument that could have made the claim more effective?

What the Mainstream Media Won’t Tell You: The Research Fallacy Essay

What the Mainstream Media Won’t Tell You: The Research Fallacy Essay
Background: A conspiracy theory is a paranoid belief that unseen malevolent powers control and
suppress naiVe people through extreme or mundane events. People use them to make sense of a
chaotic world, stripping events of all nuances and seeing the world as a simple dichotomy of good and evil’ With the internet, conspiracy theories are in a golden age with new ones popping up every day.
Your Task: Pick one conspiracy theory below and research it. Give a brief history behind it but mostly
focus on the fallacies the conspiracy theorists use to back up their argument. you do not have to rebut their ideas since they are already false, but you must point out the fallacies. you must quote and cite the
sources, using them to back up your opinion. You must quote at least three if not more primary sources
in correct M.L.A. style. All these sources should have a writer,s name attached.
The Conspiracy Theories:
o The 9/11,Truth Movement or The Truthers
r Climate Change Conspiracy
r The Fluoride Conspiracy
r Vaccines Are Dangerous
o HIV Does Not Cause AtDS /
o Holocaust Deniers
o Moon Landing Conspiracy
Criteria for Success:
I search the library’s database for secondary sources to study-books, articles, et cetera about
the conspiracy- to see why they are wrong, then, do the research on Google, looking for
primary sources-theorists (those who believe in the conspiracy)-to quote and analyze. r Have a strong, concise, and persuasive thesis statement at the beginning
o Discuss specific fallacies that we have covered in class quoting by the conspiracy theorists.
Again, you do not have to rebut their claims, just point out the fallacies
‘ Quote and analyze the conspiracy theorists themselves, so you may quote their words and not a
summary of them by the critics of the conspiracy theories. You need to quote original sources
and not the secondary sources although you may quote the secondary sources for your fallacy
d iscussion.
r Cite at least three articles or books that have a writer’s name attached if possible
o Do research; you need to show your research with quotations and examples. Go to the library
and get help.
r Write compound sentences using FANBOYS, semicolons, conjunctive adverbs, transitional
phrases, and subordinators and copy proof your paper for run-on sentences, parallel errors,
fragments, subject verb agreements, and quotation and citation errors
r Cite alloutside sources in the M.L.A. format, complete with a List of Works Cited page (essays
without a List of Works Cited will not be accepted)
r Email rough draft and final draft to yourself to save essay on server
‘ Upload final draft to Turnitin.com. Class: English 1A 504. The class t.D.: 1g6053g2. The
enrollment key: textrulz5O4. Turn in hard copy in class.
1
Essay Sample
l. Thesis
Your thesis should give a short summary of the conspiracy. Then, it should mention the conspiracy
theorists and the fallacies that they use.
Example
ln 1700s, a group of intellectuals formed a group called the Bavarian llluminati whose goal was to argue
against the control of the church in state affairs and for the end wars. lts founder, Adam Weishaupt
started the llluminati to push for the secular ideas of the Enlightenment. Conservative religious groups
convinced the German government to outlaw the llluminati. Since then, many people have accused the
defunct group of controlling governments and generally being behind every bad occurrence. John
Robison, Nesta Helen webster, and william Guy carr have written books discussing their llluminati
conspiracy theories, employing fallacies such as appeal to emotion, non sequitur, ad hominem, straw
man, and doubtful cause.
ll. Body
Your essay should quote each conspiracy theorist and then point out the fallacies used by them
Example
William Guy Car argues, “[Communism] was to be used to enable the llluminati to foment future wars
and revolutions’ Clinton Roosevelt (a direct ancestor of F.D.R.) Horace Greeley, and Chas. Dana were
appointed a committee to raise funds for this new venture. The fund they raised financed Karl Marx and
Engels when they wrote “Das Capital” and “The Communist Manifesto” in Soho, England,, (1). Clinton
Roosevelt, Horace Greeley, and Charles Dana are mostly liberaljournalists and politicians. Karl Marx did
write for the newspa per, The New York Tribune, that Greeley and Dana edited, but Marx wrote antislavery
articles and not articles touting his philosophy. To say that they funded Marx and Friedrich
Engels is a straw man fallacy. Car distorts the fact by implying that Marx’s journalistic work funded him
to write his books when instead most money for the books came from Engel’s rich family. plus, to accuse
Greeley and Dana of some long-term plan to foment future wars by simply paying one out of many
reporters on their staff is a doubtful cause fallacy. The two men could not have caused Marx,s book to
become a basis for so many revolutions. car’s hindsight is all too perfect.
lll. Conclusion
Here, you can put a naysayer in the text and say why the theorists believe in these conspiracies. Don,t
agree with them, but talk about the social reasons that pushes these people to spout such theories