Theories of Socialization
1. Defining the situation – W.I. Thomas (1928)
ROLE PLAY : INTERVIEWS How the person defines/ perceives the situation = VIP E.g. a black lawyer /MD sees as incompetent based on race not qualifications/skills People acquire know. re: social life via socialization
2. Symbolic interaction – George H. Mead (1934) ROLE PLAY : HANDSHAKE CONVERSATION / SMILE We react to experiences based on the meaning of the experience to them Reaction is also based on how others view the experience Finally, the reaction of others to the experience add additional dimension to how you react to the experience E.g. youths @ church who are gone away to college → college VIP to student; others see it as prestigious; it confirms their own belief so they act accordingly Symbolic gestures → handshake; stare-down/ smile ↨ interpreted based on “ROLE TAKING” i.e. ability to put oneself in the role of the person to whom the action is directed
3. The Dramaturgical approach – Irving Goffman (studied under Mead) (?) According to Mead, role play is an integral part of communication Goffman adopts this approach and extends it by assuming that we are all ACTORS on a stage ↨ Life = theatre/stage = no director (self directed) therefore actors have to negotiate the role they will play Goffman coined the term “ IMPRESSION MGMT” (Ch. 21 –Keeping Up Appearances) ↨ one’s effort to control how one thinks of them e.g. job interview (stage), where “ interviewee” tries to impress “interviewer” Impression mgmt. extends to informal life decisions e.g. food we eat/ where we live etc. as we try to impress others of “who we are” Hard to be on “ stage” ALL the time so we have front stage and back stage
4. Ethno-methodology – Harold Garfinkel (1967) Dev. concept of “practical reasoning” ↨ in essence = people step out of their acting character to determine the reason for their “actions” ↨ WHY DID I ….????? E.g. @ family gatherings all expected to socialize BUT what happens if you don’t? → offend others/ worry others/ anger others etc. ← fam. = sees behavior as abnormal Approach is concerned w/why we behave/react the way we do.
5. Social exchange – Peter Blau & George Homans (1974) Goffman & Garfinkel studied behavior that others took for granted. HOWEVER Blau & Homans saw behavior as process of exchange → ↨ ↨ Premeditated ↔ Reciprocal Blau & Homans argues that life is based on reciprocity (give & take) e.g. see life as a ledger balance → someone does something for you so you do something for them. Or you do something to get something in return. However, some say this is not true in the case of friendships/ marriage in which only one partner = friendly BUT = based on this theory = something in marriage/partner that one actor cherishes. (even past memories)