Argument Paper on the Components of Myths
Introduction:
For this assignment, you will be writing an essay, in MLA format, of 1500-2000 words in which you will explore one or several related key components of myths and use the myths we have been reading to demonstrate it/them. In other words, you will want to take a broader approach in this paper and present an argument about how a particular myth or group of myths demonstrates other aspects of mythology. While Essay #1 was about applying a particular theory, Essay #2 involves you making a mythological argument on your own.
This assignment is due by 11:50PM ET, Sunday, at the end of Week 6. Extensions are available, but you must notify (you do not need to ask—just notify) the instructor in advance of the deadline. You may set your due date up through 11:50PM ET on Wednesday of Week 7.
Argument:
Key to this paper is understanding the difference between an argument essay and other sorts of essays. In many essays, the goal is simply to report information—to illustrate a given point. Essay #2 is not an illustration paper, in which one simply illustrates a point that is certain. Essay #2 is an argument paper; it must take up a position which must be demonstrated to be valid.
If we were to look at the myth, The Odyssey, we might see the difference between an illustration paper and an argument paper. An illustration paper thesis might be something like this—”The Odyssey teaches the reader a great deal about the ideal host/guest relationship.” No one who has read The Odyssey and understood it would dispute that point—there are many situations in which someone is a host and someone is a guest–some of these situations go well, and some of them go badly–so clearly the host/guest relationship is something one could learn about. Clearly, it is important to the story. One would just give examples—and that would be sufficient. This is an illustration paper.
An argument paper would have a thesis statement which must be demonstrated and supported. In the epic, some of the “hosts” are men or male creatures while some of the “hosts” are women or female creatures; some of the hosts are divine or semi-divine while others are mortal. One might be able to find a pattern in all of this—but it is unlikely that the pattern will be self-evident. For example, one might draw the conclusion that women or female beings are being negatively depicted in terms of the host/guest relationship (since the relationship always seems to relate to their sexuality). Another person, however, might conclude that the women or female beings are being positively depicted, since they do pretty consistently offer hospitality. A thesis which took a position on this topic would have to be supported and justified with explanation—it would not be a clear point that everyone would accept immediately. This would be an argument paper.
Before beginning this assignment, then, be sure that you understand the distinction between an argument essay and an illustration essay. The argument essay seeks to convince the reader that your point is valid; the illustration paper simply seeks to explain a new idea in a clear way.
The key will be the thesis statement. Be sure you write an argument thesis rather than an analytic or expository (illustration, for example) or narrative thesis. Be sure to review the distinction between these various types of thesis statements before you begin.
Overview:
The goal of this assignment is for you to start interpreting myth in greater complexity. The principal skills being introduced are independent development of an idea and evaluation of a text, as well as analysis and application—all of these are more complex skills than simple knowledge or comprehension (though both of these latter skills are needed for basic understanding of the myth and the concept being applied).
Within your paper, you will want to demonstrate how a particular component of mythology can be found in a given myth or myths (in any medium) and how that component works to bring meaning to the myth. For example, you could explore the significance of the various forms of myths; the relationship of myths to other disciplines, such as art or history; or the connection of myth to contemporary film. Any other connection between the concepts we have been discussing and reading about and myth—in any medium—could work well for this paper.
At the end of this document, you will find the grading rubric. Be sure to check your final draft against the grading rubric to make sure that you have included all necessary elements. Below, you will find a list of resources which you might find helpful, as well as step-by-step suggestions for how you might handle this assignment. Be sure to read the full assignment before beginning to write, and be sure to ask (well in advance of the deadline) any questions which you may have.
Resources:
Primary materials (the materials below are not mandatory—you may pick from these or other sources to find your ideas for your paper):
The Key Elements of Mythology—common elements and themes that one might find in myth: http://www.syracusecityschools.com/tfiles/folder716/The%20Key%20Elements%20of%20Myth ology.pdf
Common Elements in Creation Myths—these are the common elements and themes one might find specifically in creation myths: http://www.cs.williams.edu/~lindsey/myths/myths.html
Ways of Interpreting Myth—a basic summary of various approaches to studying myth: http://faculty.gvsu.edu/websterm/ways.htm
You may use any other resources or approaches that seem interesting to you as long as the focus is upon one or more of the various components of myth.
Secondary resources:
MLA document format—Purdue OWL’s explanation of how to format a document in MLA style: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/24/
Sample MLA Essay—Purdue OWL’s sample MLA-style paper, annotated with explanations:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/13/
Thesis Generator—Ashford University has put up a thesis generator that may help you to come up with a thesis for your paper. I used it to create a thesis for a paper on Star Wars: A New Hope and got this as a rough draft for my thesis:
While audiences found the film engaging, Lucas’s reliance on Campbell’s overly simplistic concept of the monomyth made the film one-dimensional because there is too little motivation for the action, the characters remain underdeveloped, and only the robots seem to have any real internal life.
The thesis generator is not a bad little tool if you’d like to try it: https://awc.ashford.edu/writing-tools-thesis-generator.html
Step-by-Step Suggestions:
Step 1: The first thing to do with any assignment is to read it carefully, long before you are going to give it a try, and promptly ask any questions you have.
Step 2: Select the reading(s) which you are most interested in or select the topic which you are most interested in. You might choose to look at the role of women in Greek myth; you might choose to analyze the concept of fate in Oedipus Rex; you might choose to compare creation myths of various cultures to one another. The main thing to remember is that you won’t be writing an objective report— you will be taking a position (expressing your unique insight), supporting it with information from the readings, and explaining why your insight is a valid one. So, don’t pick a topic that will only work as a report topic (that is, do not just share your knowledge—take a position which someone could oppose and show why your position is a worthwhile one to consider).
Step 3: Read or view your sources, making notes as you are reading. If your source appears also in an online summary, remember that such summaries are helpful, but don’t cite/quote from an online summary and be sure to read the actual text. Cite from the actual text. If you cannot find a full text version of the myth you are interested in, please promptly ask the instructor for assistance.
Step 4: Remember that you also have to cite any sources, including your primary sources (the versions of the myth or myths that you are discussing). If you look up secondary sources–journal articles, for example–be sure that you take good notes so that you don’t accidentally include someone else’s ideas as if they were your own. Don’t use sources (other than primary sources—like our readings) unless they are written by people with proper credentials. Just in general, unless you know how to evaluate sources to make sure that they are credible, don’t use sources except those from our library and from proper academic journals (you are free to get all the help you wish from the librarians—who will help you locate good sources, cite, and document them).
Step 5: Be sure to keep good notes when you select your examples from the texts (whether they are print, video, or other medium). If you want to see how to do an MLA-style, in-text citation for a quote or paraphrase from a book, then please look here: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/03/
Step 6: You will need to choose a thesis—the thesis will be what you will be supporting. Remember that it needs to be an argument thesis (not an expository thesis or an analytical thesis). Be sure that you choose an arguable stance which can be proven with evidence from the readings. There are many online sources (particularly on YouTube) which explain the difference between argument and expository thesis statements. You can find one here—but there are many more.
Important Note: If you look in our classroom, you will see that many of the prompts (and many of the questions asked by your fellow classmates) are argument prompts. That is, they do not have a specific, concrete answer that is inarguable. They ask you to take a position and then support it with evidence from the readings. If you found one you liked, you might borrow it and then apply it to a new reading (a question about heroes or about human/divine relations or about transformations). Just be sure that the thesis is an argument (requiring you to take a position and support it) rather than an illustration (requiring you just to explain).
Step 7: Start drafting your paper. It should be in MLA format. It should have a Works Cited page. Any source that you refer to or borrow language from must have a parenthetical reference in the text whenever you are using it. An entry for it must be listed on the Works Cited page. If you have any questions at all about how to cite and document correctly, just ask in the classroom. I really enjoy helping with these things before any problems emerge.
Important Note: Don’t use the feature in Word or any other program (even a citation generator) which creates entries. Don’t use the template for MLA in Microsoft Word. The 8th edition of the MLA handbook recently came out, and any program you have is probably going to be abiding by the older edition. In any case, Word (and other programs) almost always do MLA style incorrectly—practically everything will be wrong if you use the auto-cite features in your word processor. The right format is here. The librarians will be happy to help, and I am also happy to answer questions.
Step 8: If you are not that comfortable with writing a literary analysis essay, using an outline isn’t a bad idea. Just remember that your essay will be about 1500-2000 words long. It should have an introduction, a very brief summary of the given work/works, body paragraphs which support your thesis and prove it to be valid, and a conclusion. (Please do not use the phrase, “In conclusion,” when you start your conclusion—that works well in an oral presentation, but not in a written piece.)
Step 9: You will need to structure the essay clearly—it could be a standard five-paragraph essay (as the outline, above, suggests). Or, you might do something a bit more complex, or a traditional argument essay. But, in any case, the piece should have a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion— there should be a unifying idea as well as signposts throughout the essay which guide the reader.
Step 10: Try not to have choppy little paragraphs—group things which make sense together. Be sure to use transitions and signal phrases, and provide signposts throughout your paper–such as an introduction, a thesis statement, topic sentences, concluding sentences, and a conclusion.
Step 11: Don’t forget to edit. One good trick is to set your program up so that it will read the text out loud to you—listening to the text might help you catch errors. You can also try reading your paper aloud, yourself, and particularly reading it from the last sentence back to the first one. Doing these things will disrupt your reading and make you really listen to what you have said. Feel free to get help from a beta reader, especially for proofreading. Remember, also, that you can get help from the Effective Writing Center—you can either submit your paper for comments or you can interact live online with an EWC advisor.
If your paper contains more than 20% “unoriginal” material (that is, quotes from your source or sources, even if they are cited), then it will probably include too much quoting; if it is over 30%, it is definitely too much quoting. If there is any source included (a long passage—not just a few words) which isn’t properly cited with a parenthetical citation AND an entry on the Works Cited page, the paper may be returned to you without a grade and may require revision before a grade can be given. In severe cases, where fraud is clearly intended, the paper may be forwarded to the Academic Misconduct Committee for action.