This paper is divided into two; paper one ;
In a one page paper, Select a research study that discusses the efficacy of a treatment program for opioid use. What biases did the researchers identify in the study? What other biases did you identify? Explain your answers. Note; You will use this same study for the next 2-page paper; assignment.

part 2 (2 page paper)
use the same study from paper 1, which discusses the efficacy of a treatment program for opioid use; and answer the following questions:

What hypothesis was proposed? Did the researchers obtain an answer?
What type of intervention was utilized?
How were the participants selected?
What were the modes of data collection, analysis, and interpretation?
Do you think this can work in Anytown? Explain your answer.
The report should be 2–3 pages, excluding title and references pages. Use current APA formatting to style your paper and to cite your sources. Integrate scholarly sources into the paragraphs of your paper.
note;Use scholarly sources only

In a Word document, answer the following six questions. Your answers should be detailed and thorough. Each answer should be at least one full paragraph in length.

Part 1: Memory Techniques

Read Discovery Health’s How to Improve Your Memory While Studying(https://health.howstuffworks.com/human-body/systems/nervous-system/how-to-improve-your-memory10.htm). Then, read Michigan State University’s Study Tips(https://bconline.broward.edu/content/Term2019/357230-BEHVBEHS_PSY2012607029/Study%20Tips.pdf). Read through both documents, as well as Table 8.2 in your textbook, then answer the following:

Choose two of the memory techniques that you think would work best for you, and explain why you chose them. Describe how you can use these techniques to study for an exam.
Explain the encoding, storage, and retrieval processes and how these processes operate while studying for and taking an exam.
After reading about the Effects of Massed Versus Distributed Practice on Learning (Figure 8.11 in your textbook), describe two ways that you could improve your study habits.
Part 2: Short Term Memory and Forgetting

Next, let’s test your short term memory! First, test your ability to remember a series of letters with this Short Term Memory Test(http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/stm0.html). Once you have completed that, then test your ability to remember a series of pictures with this Short Term Memory Picture Game(http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/puzmatch.html). After you have completed both activities, then answer the following:

Describe your results. Was it easier to remember the letters or the pictures? Why?
Discuss the process of forgetting (think about the Ebbighaus Forgetting Curve, discussed in your textbook). Answer the following questions in your response:
Why did you forget some of the letters and pictures in these activities?
Why do you forget some of the information that you studied while you are taking an exam?
Why do you forget some of the information that you learned in your class after the class is over?
How would you be able to move these items from your short term memory into your long term memory? What would need to happen?

Prompt: Compose a 3-4 page rhetorical analysis of Michael Kimmel’s article from Language Awareness. Focus on discussing aspects of the rhetoric rather than summarizing or critiquing the topic.
Format: MLA format, Submitted through Blackboard Safe Assignment

Focus: You should dedicate a section of your essay to each area of rhetoric below, quoting or summarizing specific passages in MLA format to support your discussion. Your goal is to explain to an audience how and where the author uses elements of rhetoric and argue how effectively the author uses elements of rhetoric.
Remember, an analysis is an argumentative essay. It will have an introduction, a thesis, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Your thesis is going to focus on how much and how effectively the author uses the various elements of rhetoric. All sections have to be supported by direct evidence cited from the article. You may choose to write about each aspect in any order, but all 4 areas below and the questions posed below need to be discussed in your essay.
Aspects of Rhetoric
1. Audience
Discuss: who is the intended audience, how / where does the author indicate this, how is the author’s language (vocab, syntax, grammar) appropriate to his audience, is this the best audience for the author’s Purpose? Quote / summarize specific examples from the text to support your argument.

2. Purpose
Discuss: what is the author’s goal, how / where does the author make this known, is the author’s goal appropriate for his chosen audience, is the purpose clear? Quote specific examples from the text to support your argument.

3. Situation
Discuss: what is the author’s situation, how / where does the author make this known, is the situation clear, does the author’s argument logically follow the situation?

4. Claims and appeals
Discuss: what is the author’s thesis? What are some of the author’s minor claims? Discuss specific examples of how the author uses logos, ethos, and pathos to support his claims throughout the article.

This paper is divided into two; paper one ;
In a one page paper, Select a research study that discusses the efficacy of a treatment program for opioid use. What biases did the researchers identify in the study? What other biases did you identify? Explain your answers. Note; You will use this same study for the next 2-page paper; assignment.

part 2 (2 page paper)
use the same study from paper 1, which discusses the efficacy of a treatment program for opioid use; and answer the following questions:

What hypothesis was proposed? Did the researchers obtain an answer?
What type of intervention was utilized?
How were the participants selected?
What were the modes of data collection, analysis, and interpretation?
Do you think this can work in Anytown? Explain your answer.
The report should be 2–3 pages, excluding title and references pages. Use current APA formatting to style your paper and to cite your sources. Integrate scholarly sources into the paragraphs of your paper.
note;Use scholarly sources only

Consider the accumulated sources of error and the different factors affecting our reasoning styles. For this assignment, focus on a typical setting in your own profession.
How does context affect your ability to conduct critical thinking and the ability of your colleagues to reason with you?
As you answer the question, briefly describe a setting in which a discussion might occur in your profession, either an imagined situation or one you have experienced. Consider the factors in that setting that might serve as sources of error or might influence you or your colleagues as you reason and describe at least four of those factors.
Prepare a 3- to 4-paragraph original response and post it to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned.
Through the end of the module, analyze the responses submitted by at least two of your classmates. Provide objective comments regarding why you agree or disagree with their analyses.
Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Quality of initial posting, including fulfillment of assignment instructions 16
Quality of responses to classmates 12
Frequency of responses to classmates 4
Reference to supporting readings and other materials 4
Language and grammar 4
Total: 40

• Reflect on the information you have learned in your readings for Module 1, thinking about information related to human sexuality that you would like to know more about.
• Formulate a research question.
• Why would your research question be important to study?
• What lessons did you learn from studies such as Kinsey’s and Master’s & Johnson’s that will help you design your own study?
• Explain how you would go about investigating your research study (e.g., describe type of research method used, your sample, etc.).
• Describe the ethical issues you will have to consider when designing your study.
Submit your response to the Submissions Area by the due assigned. Your response should be at least 2 pages long, and include a cover page and reference list.
Grading Criteria Maximum Points
Formulated a research question based on information learned and why it is important to study. 20
Described lessons learned from Kinsey and Masters and Johnson that will help study the research question. 20
Explained design of research study (e.g., type of method, sample). 20
Described potential ethical issues. 20
Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.. 20
Total: 100

Responses to discussion questions should adhere to the following criteria:
• Responses should be thorough and address all components of the discussion question, typically 250 words in length.
• Students are expected to support responses with appropriate evidence. Students may incorporate anecdotal evidence as well as research. In those cases where research is used, students should include parenthetical citations and references using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
• Reference are required

1.
Describe how the role of advanced registered nurse transformed over time. Consider shifts in scope and expectations in the 20th and 21st centuries. In what ways will the advanced registered nurse role and responsibilities continue to evolve and emerge as the American health care system changes? (250 words)

2. Access The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health. Identify the two recommendations for nursing education you believe will be most effective or radical in creating change within the industry. Provide rationale based on your experience in practice. Do you agree or disagree with how the Institute of Medicine (IOM) describes the advanced practice registered nurse role evolving. Why or why not? (250 words)

3. Identify at least three regulatory bodies or industry regulations that specify certification, licensure requirements, or scope of practice for your specialty. Discuss the way these bodies or regulations influence the educational requirements and experiences for your specialty. Advanced practice registered nurses must incorporate the APRN consensus model in their response. (250 words)

4. Compare two different advanced registered nurse roles with regard to ethical guidelines. Are there any differences in the ethical guidelines that govern these roles? What situations might require one role to respond differently, depending on the ethical guidelines? (250 words)

• Concepts of Truth
Before 1972, scientists believed that the rings of Saturn were composed of gasses or dust; on tests, any student who claimed that Saturn’s rings were composed of solids was incorrect because the true answer was that the rings were a gas. Later scientific investigation has shown that the rings are, in fact, composed of solid matter. Did the truth change? Should these students retroactively be given credit? Which group of students originally knew the correct answer?
Similarly, in the 1950s and 1960s physicians knew that stress caused ulcers, although we now know that bacteria causes ulcers. What does this imply for our definition of the words truth and knowing?
Prepare a 3- to 5-paragraph response and submit it to the Discussion Area by the due date assigned,
Through the end of the module, comment on the responses of two other students, promoting a discussion about preconceptions and any thoughts you may have after reading all responses.
Provide helpful critiques of the responses, analyzing the preconceptions regarding the relationship between truth and the knowledge that something is true. Provide your reaction or thoughts after reading the other students’

Write a paper outlining the Five of the 22 MPH Foundational Competencies Relevant for Clinic Alzheimer’s disease study and prevention project. You can use the following five competencies below but elaborate them in detail and do research on them for accuracy.
Five Competencies below
Applying epidemiology methods in health practice, selecting both quantitative and qualitative methods to come up with data concerning Alzheimer’s disease as a public health practice, discussing multiple dimensions of the policy-making process that includes ethics, perform effective and inter-professional team management, and discussing population-based policies design and project-based intervention.Applying epidemiology methods in health practice, selecting both quantitative and qualitative methods to come up with data concerning Alzheimer’s disease as a public health practice, discussing multiple dimensions of the policy-making process that includes ethics, perform effective and inter-professional team management, and discussing population-based policies design and project-based intervention.

you will be writing a “position paper” (word count of 1800-2300 words): this is a research paper in which you will address a particular issue introduced in the topic of the paper (see below for the list of topic choices). It should be written in a formal style, in the third-person voice, and it will present your original, considered solution or unique approach to solving the problem or settling the issue in question. It will be your opinion, but the main point of writing a position paper is to let others know not just your opinion or point of view on an issue, but also to know the reasons why you hold this point of view. The presentation of your “reasons why,” in other words, the sum of evidence you find to support your position, plus a statement of the position itself, comprises what philosophers call an “argument.” This kind of paper is also known as an “argumentative essay.” A philosophical argument is simply giving reasons (the premises of the argument) for why a particular claim (the conclusion of the argument) should be taken as true.

The introductory paragraph should present the issue in question and include a clear and precise statement of your thesis, which is your position on the issue. Another essential element of the position paper or argumentative essay is a consideration of at least one alternative position on the same issue, and this is typically an opposing view. So in this paper, you will assert and defend your own position, and you will also consider an opposing or alternative position on the issue and the argument(s) in support of that view. Finally, you will show why you reject that opposing or alternative position and instead hold the one you do. There are several different ways of organizing the paper, but, after you have stated your thesis in the introduction, often the opposing viewed is fairly presented first, then your understanding of the issue follows, with your position then asserted and shown to be superior to the opposing view. This can be done in “block” or “point-by-point” fashion: use the organization style that best suits your purposes. Your conclusion will re-state your “expanded” thesis, setting it back into its more general framework with a look forward toward related concerns. Your conclusion should be brief, but it should leave the reader with the belief that your position satisfactorily settles the issue, solves the problem, and leads to a better state of affairs. You may also want to use descriptive headings for each of the major sections of the paper. But don’t use the section heading, “Introduction” above your introductory paragraph: the title of your paper serves that purpose. And for the conclusion, don’t just use the word, “Conclusion” by itself: it should be “Conclusion: ……” where the “…..” describes or gives a snapshot of your final position.

Note that this is quite different from an informational report or even a commentary on a subject. You will be writing about at least two sides of an issue (usually the “pro” and the “con” positions), developing supporting evidence for both sides, analyzing, evaluating, and refuting competing arguments, and showing and explaining why your argument and the conclusion it supports (your thesis) is superior. For an excellent and detailed explanation (with illustrative examples) of how to write a position paper or argumentative essay (the document uses the term “argument essay”), please read the following document:
Position Papers (accessed on http://www.pearsonhighered.com/showcase/johnson-sheehan/assets/ch11.pdf). It tells you everything you need to know, and if you follow the instructions here to the letter, you are sure to get a high mark on the paper, and you will have gained valuable knowledge about to construct an important and respected style of academic essay.