CHOOSE ONE QUESTION IN THE BELOW THREE QUESTIONS AND READ THE READING IN THE GOOGLE LINK TO ANSWER THE QUESTION Please remember to refer back to the reading while answering the questions.
Q1. Choose one thinker or text that addresses the idea of individual freedom. Discuss how it is conceptualized (i.e. in relation to what other ideas), and examine how it may contribute to contemporary society.

Q2. Choose one thinker of text that offers a vision of society. Examine the idea and discuss particular aspects of this vision that can be found as being pursued in contemporary society.

Q3. Choose one thinker or text that offers insight on peace. Examine the ideas and discuss how far they may illuminate the understanding of a particular incident in your life or in the contemporary world relating to the pursuit of peace.

******IDENTIFY, PRIORITIZE, EXPLAIN and interpret particular ideas from the texts. You will also explore, analyze and develop them in writing. All these are activities requiring close reading and thinking; they are essential components for making reflective and meaningful judgments on the question you have in hand.*****

GOOGLE LINK: (there should be 44 images for you to read)
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/11S09ZYwfLr924pa5tB3qwwJfg-UPzdym?usp=sharing

-The questions require that you define accurately particular topics, while at the same time, offer interpretations that are open-ended. “Open-ended” does not mean vague or “anything goes”. It means there are more ways to interpret the ideas than just one single correct answer.

-Your response must regard the texts as evidence, and engage with them as the ground of your reasoning. Where evidence is partial or not available, your judgement on how to regard what is missing and the uncertainties the thinkers demonstrate is also relevant.

-Any citation details within the body of your essay are included in the word count. However, footnotes are NOT included in the word count.

-700 ENGLISH WORDS
*The topics mentioned in the questions below may be explicitly or implicitly addressed by a thinker. Either case could make your choice of text a good one. *Limit and regulate the scope of your analysis – aim not at covering ‘everything’ because it’s impossible; aim, instead, at examining, explaining and developing a relevant idea adequately in context. *In many cases, your conclusion could be open-ended, especially when more than one interpretation is possible within reasonable limits, and when there are ambiguities and uncertainties in the text itself.