This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo: Content |
30.0 pts
Video presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements: • Introduction of self • Presentation of healthcare policy concern • Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern • Summary • Information was relevant to healthcare concern and its solution |
26.0 pts
Video presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all the following elements: • Introduction of self • Presentation of healthcare policy concern • Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern • Summary • Information was relevant to healthcare concern and its solution |
24.0 pts
Video presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all the following elements: • Introduction of self • Presentation of healthcare policy concern • Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern • Summary • Information was relevant to healthcare concern and its solution |
11.0 pts
Video presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Introduction of self • Presentation of healthcare policy concern • Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern • Summary • Information was relevant to healthcare concern and its solution |
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Introduction of self • Presentation of healthcare policy concern • Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern • Summary • Information was relevant to healthcare concern and its solution |
|
30.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo: Method of Delivery |
30.0 pts
Video presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements: • Effective opening • Stayed connected to audience • Grammar was correct |
26.0 pts
Video presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all the following elements: • Effective opening • Stayed connected to audience • Grammar was correct |
24.0 pts
Video presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all the following elements: • Effective opening • Stayed connected to audience • Grammar was correct |
11.0 pts
Video presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Effective opening • Stayed connected to audience • Grammar was correct |
0.0 pts
Video presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: • Effective opening • Stayed connected to audience • Grammar was correct |
|
30.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVideo: Style of Delivery |
30.0 pts
Video presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements: • Eye contact • Voice clarity • Gestures • Appearance |
26.0 pts
Video presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all the following elements: • Eye contact • Voice clarity • Gestures • Appearance |
24.0 pts
Video presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all the following elements: • Eye contact • Voice clarity • Gestures • Appearance |
11.0 pts
Video presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Eye contact • Voice clarity • Gestures • Appearance |
0.0 pts
Video presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: • Eye contact • Voice clarity • Gestures • Appearance |
|
30.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Content: Overview of the healthcare policy concern and solution |
10.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements: • Identification of the healthcare policy • Identification of the student identified solution • Relevance to the community or population group |
9.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all the following elements: • Identification of the healthcare policy • Identification of the student identified solution • Relevance to the community or population group |
8.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all the following elements: • Identification of the healthcare policy • Identification of the student identified solution • Relevance to the community or population group |
4.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Identification of the healthcare policy • Identification of the student identified solution • Relevance to the community or population group |
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: • Identification of the healthcare policy • Identification of the student identified solution • Relevance to the community or population group |
|
10.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Content: Identification of communication techniques |
30.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements: • Identification of the selected elected official and position • Rationale for the selection • Identification of 4 (four) beneficial communication/presentation techniques • Providing scholarly resources that support the use of the identified communication techniques |
26.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all the following elements: • Identification of the selected elected official and position • Rationale for the selection • Identification of 4 (four) beneficial communication/presentation techniques • Providing scholarly resources that support the use of the identified communication techniques |
24.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all the following elements: • Identification of the selected elected official and position • Rationale for the selection • Identification of 4 (four) beneficial communication/presentation techniques • Providing scholarly resources that support the use of the identified communication techniques |
11.0 pts
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: • Identification of the selected elected official and position • Rationale for the selection • Identification of 4 (four) beneficial communication/presentation techniques • Providing scholarly resources that support the use of the identified communication techniques |
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: • Identification of the selected elected official and position • Rationale for the selection • Identification of 4 (four) beneficial communication/presentation techniques • Providing scholarly resources that support the use of the identified communication techniques |
|
30.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Content: Self-evaluation of video presentation |
30.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all the following elements: • Content: o Introduction of self o Presentation of healthcare policy concern o Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern o Summary o Information is relevant to healthcare concern and its solution • Method of Delivery: o Effective opening o Stayed connected to audience o Grammar was correct • Style of Delivery: o Eye contact o Voice clarity o Gestures o Appearance • The student must self-evaluate oneself on each of the following areas by identifying one positive and one area to improve for each of the above headings (i.e. content, method of delivery, and style of delivery) |
26.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all the following elements: • Content: o Introduction of self o Presentation of healthcare policy concern o Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern o Summary o Information is relevant to healthcare concern and its solution • Method of Delivery: o Effective opening o Stayed connected to audience o Grammar was correct • Style of Delivery: o Eye contact o Voice clarity o Gestures o Appearance • The student must self-evaluate oneself on each of the following areas by identifying one positive and one area to improve for each of the above headings (i.e. content, method of delivery, and style of delivery) |
24.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all the following elements: • Content: o Introduction of self o Presentation of healthcare policy concern o Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern o Summary o Information is relevant to healthcare concern and its solution • Method of Delivery: o Effective opening o Stayed connected to audience o Grammar was correct • Style of Delivery: o Eye contact o Voice clarity o Gestures o Appearance • The student must self-evaluate oneself on each of the following areas by identifying one positive and one area to improve for each of the above headings (i.e. content, method of delivery, and style of delivery) |
11.0 pts
Presentation of information in one or two of the major headings fails to meet expectations: • Content: o Introduction of self o Presentation of healthcare policy concern o Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern o Summary o Information is relevant to healthcare concern and its solution • Method of Delivery: o Effective opening o Stayed connected to audience o Grammar was correct • Style of Delivery: o Eye contact o Voice clarity o Gestures o Appearance • The student must self-evaluate oneself on each of the following areas by identifying one positive and one area to improve for each of the above headings (i.e. content, method of delivery, and style of delivery) |
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or four of the major headings: • Content: o Introduction of self o Presentation of healthcare policy concern o Presentation of student identified solution to the healthcare policy concern o Summary o Information is relevant to healthcare concern and its solution • Method of Delivery: o Effective opening o Stayed connected to audience o Grammar was correct • Style of Delivery: o Eye contact o Voice clarity o Gestures o Appearance • The student must self-evaluate oneself on each of the following areas by identifying one positive and one area to improve for each of the above headings (i.e. content, method of delivery, and style of delivery) |
|
30.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePaper Content: Conclusion |
10.0 pts
Presentation of information was exceptional: • Provides a summary of key elements from the assignment |
9.0 pts
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial: • Provides a summary of key elements from the assignment |
8.0 pts
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated: • Provides a summary of key elements from the assignment |
4.0 pts
Presentation of information fails to meet expectations: • Provides a summary of key elements from the assignment |
0.0 pts
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory: • Provides a summary of key elements from the assignment |
|
10.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Specifications |
10.0 pts
This assignment included all of the following: Video presentation is a minimum of 3 minutes to a maximum of 5 minutes. Recording is via Voice Thread. Paper meets length requirements of 2 to 4 pages. Minimum of 4 (four) appropriate research scholarly nursing references. A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to assignment submission. |
9.0 pts
This assignment included only five of the following: Video presentation is a minimum of 3 minutes to a maximum of 5 minutes. Recording is via Voice Thread. Paper meets length requirements of 2 to 4 pages. Minimum of 4 (four) appropriate research scholarly nursing references. A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to assignment submission. |
8.0 pts
This assignment included only four of the following: Video presentation is a minimum of 3 minutes to a maximum of 5 minutes. Recording is via Voice Thread. Paper meets length requirements of 2 to 4 pages. Minimum of 4 (four) appropriate research scholarly nursing references. A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to assignment submission. |
4.0 pts
This assignment included only three of the following: Video presentation is a minimum of 3 minutes to a maximum of 5 minutes. Recording is via Voice Thread. Paper meets length requirements of 2 to 4 pages. Minimum of 4 (four) appropriate research scholarly nursing references. A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to assignment submission. |
0.0 pts
This assignment included two or less of the following: Video presentation is a minimum of 3 minutes to a maximum of 5 minutes. Recording is via Voice Thread. Paper meets length requirements of 2 to 4 pages. Minimum of 4 (four) appropriate research scholarly nursing references. A dictionary, required textbook for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to assignment submission. |
|
10.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format |
10.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 0 to 1 APA error was present |
9.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 2 – 3 APA errors were present |
8.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 4 – 5 APA were are present |
4.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, • body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 6 – 7 APA were are present |
0.0 pts
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the • title page, • running head, body of paper (including citations and headings), and reference page One deduction for each type of APA format error 8 or greater APA errors were present |
|
10.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations in Text |
5.0 pts
There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge |
4.0 pts
There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge |
3.0 pts
There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge |
2.0 pts
There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge |
0.0 pts
There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge |
|
5.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics |
5.0 pts
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual |
4.0 pts
3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual |
3.0 pts
5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual |
2.0 pts
7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual |
0.0 pts
9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual |
|
5.0 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Deductions |
0.0 pts
0 pts lost – submission met deadline |
0.0 pts
Student does not meet the deadline for submission 10% per day up to 30% total (3-days) |
|
0.0 pts |
Total Points: 200.0 |