Complete the required rubric for this speech (no need to submit the rubric). The rubric is located under the Discussion Videos folder. Then:

Discuss your grading of each section in paragraph form

What are two strengths of this speaker? (respond with at least 1 paragraph)

What are two areas this speaker can improve? (respond with at least 1 paragraph)

RUBRIC
Does the speaker capture attention and establish the introduction?
1) relevant attention- getting device
2) clear purpose
3) credibility established
4) preview of main points

Is the organizational structure clear?

Did the speaker use language effectively? 1) avoided offensive language (sexist,racist,etc.); 2) demonstrated grammatically correct language usage; 3) appropriate vocabulary; 4) vivid imagery; 5) avoided vocalized hesitancies.

Did the speaker exhibit good use of notes?

Did the speaker have effective eye contact?

Was the speaker’s nonverbal presentation effective? 1) appropriate appearance (no pajamas, hats, sunglasses); 2) poised, confident movement; 3) effective

use of gestures; 4) appropriate facial expressions; 5) good posture

Did the speaker have effective vocal quality?
1) appropriate pitch
2) appropriate rate and use of pauses (not too fast or too slow)
3) appropriate volume (not too loud or too soft) 4) appropriate pronunciation/articulation 5) appropriate enthusiasm; spontaneous delivery

10. Did the speech include a summary and an effective conclusion?
1) restatement of the main points
2) restatement of the significance
3) use of effective closing device
4) clearly indicates that this is the end of the speech

Are points supported with qualified sources (logos)?

Does the speaker adequately describe the need (reason) for change? 1) clear statement of the problem; 2) examples and illustrations given to clarify the problem; 3) seriousness of the problem shown; 4) problem is shown to affect the audience

Were emotional appeals (pathos ) present in the speech?

Does the speaker have credibility (ethos)? 1) was sincere; 2) had credible sources; 3) established common ground with the audience 4) referred to own experience

Was visual aid effectively integrated?

Did the speaker fit within set time limits?